Chess will never be solved, here's why

Hahahahaah.
I took over a year off this forum. Very recently.
Unfollowed it completely.
But checked back a couple of weeks ago.
Found tygxc still dominating.
And in the same way. And without much effort at all.
With 'O' intensely jealous.
Very little change.
And BC 'BigChess' the new guy will want that to be about 'somebody else'.
I can predict and post for him now. In advance.
Come on BC ... confirm.
tygxc's and O's behaviours aren't about them.
Right?
Come on now.
Lets see your Confirm and your own Politics/Aggression now ...

Not unfortunately. Righteously.
And you being a new guy means you don't know about 'misinformation'.
'Never said it wasn't about them'
Of course you did.
Everything O does - "him getting himself muted and blocked is just 'unlucky' and not about him?"... is exactly the Ridiculous Nonsense that you want to troll over and over and over as 'johnny come lately'.
Its become predictable. That's who you are.
Until you wake up out of it. But you go right ahead and play 'new defense lawyer' - I've seen that many times on the website.
Read Dio's efficient #9941 so that you have the foggiest idea of what's going on.

I mean for a guy who doesn't even play chess talking like this is sorta strange your not even using the website for it's intended purpose which is to play chess 💀

Meanwhile ICCF World Championship Finals: 106 games, 106 draws.
I say:
106 games with 0 error.
I am willing to accept the possibility of 105 games with 0 error, 0 with 1 error, 1 with 2 errors.
That still leaves 105 perfect games with no errors and Chess being a draw.

It is disrespectful to compare correspondence games that last a few years to drawing balls out of an urn, MNMs out of a jar, or coin flips. No random effect is involved, only much calculation.

Even so, when a coin is flipped 106 times and lands heads 106 times,
then I conclude that the coin is loaded.
You could say to flip the coin 106 times more and it might land tails 106 times and the coin may be balanced after all, but I do not buy that.

The essence of statistics to draw conclusions about a set from observations about a subset.

"And the clubs also pander to the 'anti-blocking people' (who aren't always trolling people).
Am I complaining?
No. I'm telling it like it is. Like I do.
I havey zero motivation to tell a single lie.

just cause you don't want to lie doesn't mean you don't fall for delusions 

But many regard honesty and accuracy as 'weakness'.
Let them. As long as they don't have power it doesn't matter."

then if your being brutally honest arnt you just being mean 🤔

Off topic... Avoiding the question to 

This sounds like yapping your just glossing over the question again I was talking about chess.com not reddit or quora

I checked out Reddit and Quora.
Quora claims they're much better and that Reddit is 'the trollfest'.
I don't know. I've never tried them.
Although I often see their entries on google.
I found out Reddit has got at least one thing right.
After one makes a Reddit account - you cannot post at all there for a whole week.
Which is very intelligent.

It puts a big damper on the whole 'returning account instant diarrhoea' that chess.com allows.
In other words when chess.com rightly mutes/bans somebody or somebody rightly blocks somebody in a public forum ... so then the trolling person makes a new chess.com account Instantly with a VPN and resumes trolling in the same place Instantly.
Many of the chess.com clubs are wise to that and just make it a rule you've got to have been with chess.com for months before you can join their club.
--------------------------------------
Does this mean that the clubs are much better for various subjects than the public forums are?
No. Its a paradox like so many things are.
In the politics clubs there are various cliques and factions.
Not 'cabals' as O constantly deludes himself about .
Cliques.
The club owners and administrators of the very few clubs allowing politics discussions are so concerned about having enough 'activity and new members' that they end up pandering to their 'favorite trolling people' and so the trolling people win. They even end up on the admin teams sometimes.
And the clubs also pander to the 'anti-blocking people' (who aren't always trolling people).

Am I complaining?
No. I'm telling it like it is. Like I do.
I have absolutely zero motivation to tell a single lie.
But many regard honesty and accuracy as 'weakness'.
Let them. As long as they don't have power it doesn't matter.

By your just stating a bunch of stuff that's your opinion on how the website functions your not answering why you haven't played chess in like two years 🤦

your avoiding talking about yourself while yapping about other people

I think I've gotten BC over his 'phony anger' now.
He seems to be now cured of that particular pretense.
Got the help he needed with that.
Progress made.

No I just switched boomer style of arguing to gen z style of arguing

You switched your phoninesses BC.
Keep being phony.

Your skipping the question again ...

If you only come to chess.com to argue you prob should be touching grass instead of trying to insult/criticize other people and trying to "put them in there place "

So why are you here if you don't play chess exactly ?

You skip BC.
But you've been cured of your 'phony anger'.
I'll take credit for that.
Now you want to worry about my chess?
Pretend that I don't post zillions of chess posts including here?
Worry about me and my posts?
Fine. Worry away.
---------------------------------------
You also haven't learned that a question doesn't have a halo over it.
Your questions don't have light coming out of them.
You need to get over that delusion BC.
But I probably won't cure you of that one.
I'll have zero concern about you failing to answer my questions.
I predicted that anyway.
Now - worry about my posts. And whatever you do - don't follow your own advice.
Prediction - you'll handle it better than O.
But - everybody does.

Again not answering the question ...

I'll help start the sentence since your trying to redirect it towards someone else

I don't play chess here because I...{insert answer here }

I kind of like tygxc.
He takes on all comers.
Dozens of people try to tell him about his claims being invalid.
But he keeps right on.
Kind of in a friendly way. Unlike O.
And he appears to believe his own stuff.
But I'm not sure.
He doesn't come off as phony though. Unlike BC.
Anyway - tygxc 'always wins'.
People can't prevent it. For two years now.

I'll indulge BC a bit.
He wants attention.
You're phony BC.
But keep being phony.
Maybe it'll even have some more entertainment value.
I told you - if you want to shut me up here - then you need lots of water.
Take that cold shower yet?

Not trying to shut you up rn I just want you to answer the question 💀 which your avoiding.

Of course you are.
You're fake as could be.
But its funny now.
Your 'anger' was probably fake too.