"Play-Dough also considered horrible, officially!!!"
"It totally dries up and gets hard. What's up with that?!", said Professor Dumbkowitz of Harvard University. Riot police have gone home, since an actual riot is expected.
News of the World Online
Chess.com Now Officially Horrible
Sort:
Buy a membership and there are no ads. For free, well, beggars can't be choosers.
20 minutes for what to work?
And I dont notice THAT bad of ads, given my membership status....
I'm sure you're just having a bad day, MOUNTAINTOP, nothing a good drink and some comedy movies can't remedy! :D
MOUNTAINTOP wrote:
Just one question: What in the world were you possibly thinking with the new version?
No one wants to wait 20 minutes to actually get it to work.
When no one plays...no one clicks on ads. Hello!!!!!!! This isn't rocket science!
This thread needs more caps.
That's my kinda mountain.
Sorry...maybe it's just me, but half of the time it's freezing up with the new version. Once it gets working, it is fine. I don't mind ads. Heck, that's what helps pay for this site.
I really wish they would keep it simple. Quick, fast, and little worries. They have essentially added a bunch of fluff when it's really not needed.
Here are your caps:
GO BACK TO THE OLD VERSION! QUIT SCREWING AROUND WITH WORTHLESS FEATURES! PEOPLE JUST WANT TO PLAY CHESS!
[COMMENT DELETED]
Even better than waffles.
Jul 21, 2011
0
#11
I ALSO THINK CHESS.COM USING ADS IS RIDICULOUS BECAUSE I DONT WANT HOW DARE THEY TRY TO MAKE MONEY AND 20 MINUTES IS A LONG TIME TO WAIT FOR SOME UNSPECIFIED ACTION TO OCCUR!!!111!!!1
Oh, wait... I'm diamond. Nevermind.
Jul 21, 2011
0
#12
the new way they implemented searching for matches is very poor...they need to revert back to the old system, which there was NOTHING wrong with...
hardly anyone is playing live chess right now..it's pretty lame
Jul 21, 2011
0
#13
NiiLoC wrote:
the new way they implemented searching for matches is very poor...they need to revert back to the old system, which there was NOTHING wrong with...
hardly anyone is playing live chess right now..it's pretty lame 
| Live: | 3,781 as of now |
MOUNTAINTOP wrote:
Sorry...maybe it's just me, but half of the time it's freezing up with the new version. Once it gets working, it is fine. I don't mind ads. Heck, that's what helps pay for this site.
I really wish they would keep it simple. Quick, fast, and little worries. They have essentially added a bunch of fluff when it's really not needed.
Here are your caps:
GO BACK TO THE OLD VERSION! QUIT SCREWING AROUND WITH WORTHLESS FEATURES! PEOPLE JUST WANT TO PLAY CHESS!
I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop. 
Jul 21, 2011
0
#15
kco wrote:
NiiLoC wrote:
the new way they implemented searching for matches is very poor...they need to revert back to the old system, which there was NOTHING wrong with...
hardly anyone is playing live chess right now..it's pretty lame
Live: 3,781 as of now
that's how many people are TRYING to play....there were only 50 something games going on when i just checked...
only one seek at a time=fail..
they need to revert back
Jul 21, 2011
0
#16
Joseph-S wrote:
I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop. 
I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop.
Hilarious!
trysts wrote:
Joseph-S wrote:
I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop.
Hilarious!
Not so sure, erik thinks so. 
Jul 21, 2011
0
#19
Joseph-S wrote:
Not so sure, erik thinks so.
Far too brilliant not to be appreciated
Just one question: What in the world were you possibly thinking with the new version?
No one wants to wait 20 minutes to actually get it to work.
When no one plays...no one clicks on ads. Hello!!!!!!! This isn't rocket science!