Chess.com Now Officially Horrible

Sort:
Avatar of MOUNTAINTOP

Just one question:  What in the world were you possibly thinking with the new version?

No one wants to wait 20 minutes to actually get it to work.

When no one plays...no one clicks on ads.  Hello!!!!!!!  This isn't rocket science!

Avatar of trysts

"Play-Dough also considered horrible, officially!!!"

"It totally dries up and gets hard. What's up with that?!", said Professor Dumbkowitz of Harvard University. Riot police have gone home, since an actual riot is expected.

                    News of the World Online

Avatar of 1pawndown

Buy a membership and there are no ads. For free, well, beggars can't be choosers.

Avatar of Zerrogi

20 minutes for what to work?

And I dont notice THAT bad of ads, given my membership status....

I'm sure you're just having a bad day, MOUNTAINTOP, nothing a good drink and some comedy movies can't remedy!  :D

Avatar of oinquarki
MOUNTAINTOP wrote:

Just one question:  What in the world were you possibly thinking with the new version?

No one wants to wait 20 minutes to actually get it to work.

When no one plays...no one clicks on ads.  Hello!!!!!!!  This isn't rocket science!


This thread needs more caps.

Avatar of happyfanatic

WHY?

Avatar of oinquarki

That's my kinda mountain.

Avatar of MOUNTAINTOP

Sorry...maybe it's just me, but half of the time it's freezing up with the new version.  Once it gets working, it is fine.  I don't mind ads.  Heck, that's what helps pay for this site. 

I really wish they would keep it simple.  Quick, fast, and little worries.  They have essentially added a bunch of fluff when it's really not needed. 

Here are your caps:

GO BACK TO THE OLD VERSION!  QUIT SCREWING AROUND WITH WORTHLESS FEATURES!  PEOPLE JUST WANT TO PLAY CHESS!

Avatar of MOUNTAINTOP
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of Timotheous

Even better than waffles.

Avatar of Cry_Wolf

I ALSO THINK CHESS.COM USING ADS IS RIDICULOUS BECAUSE I DONT WANT HOW DARE THEY TRY TO MAKE MONEY AND 20 MINUTES IS A LONG TIME TO WAIT FOR SOME UNSPECIFIED ACTION TO OCCUR!!!111!!!1

Oh, wait... I'm diamond. Nevermind.

Avatar of ColinStapczynski

the new way they implemented searching for matches is very poor...they need to revert back to the old system, which there was NOTHING wrong with...

hardly anyone is playing live chess right now..it's pretty lame

Avatar of kco
NiiLoC wrote:

the new way they implemented searching for matches is very poor...they need to revert back to the old system, which there was NOTHING wrong with...

hardly anyone is playing live chess right now..it's pretty lame Undecided


 

Live: 3,781 as of now Undecided
Avatar of Joseph-S
MOUNTAINTOP wrote:

Sorry...maybe it's just me, but half of the time it's freezing up with the new version.  Once it gets working, it is fine.  I don't mind ads.  Heck, that's what helps pay for this site. 

I really wish they would keep it simple.  Quick, fast, and little worries.  They have essentially added a bunch of fluff when it's really not needed. 

Here are your caps:

GO BACK TO THE OLD VERSION!  QUIT SCREWING AROUND WITH WORTHLESS FEATURES!  PEOPLE JUST WANT TO PLAY CHESS!


 

I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop.    Smile

Avatar of ColinStapczynski
kco wrote:
NiiLoC wrote:

the new way they implemented searching for matches is very poor...they need to revert back to the old system, which there was NOTHING wrong with...

hardly anyone is playing live chess right now..it's pretty lame


 

Live: 3,781 as of now 

that's how many people are TRYING to play....there were only 50 something games going on when i just checked...

only one seek at a time=fail..

 

they need to revert back

Avatar of trysts
Joseph-S wrote:


 

 

I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop.    Smile

 

 

I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop.   


Hilarious!Laughing

Avatar of kco

3721 users online. 1215 games in progress. 50 games ?

Avatar of Joseph-S
trysts wrote:
Joseph-S wrote:


 

 

 

 

 

I hear what you're saying, Mountaintop.   

 

 

 


Hilarious!


 Not so sure, erik thinks so.    Wink

Avatar of trysts
Joseph-S wrote:


 Not so sure, erik thinks so.   


Far too brilliant not to be appreciatedWink

Avatar of rooky_rookardo
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of Guest8729588798
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.