do americans actually think naka

Sort:
superking500

is stronger then Magnus?

CP6033

i don't know but he isn't even in his ball park ok he draws, but that is about all

Scottrf

Are you just going to keep inventing straw men to troll?

JohnnyKGB

Paul_A_88

he's in the same league - but the bottom of it

CP6033
Scottrf wrote:

Are you just going to keep inventing straw men to troll?

would you quit it? thanks if you do

TheGreatOogieBoogie

No we don't.  At least I remain objective in the matter.  He is slightly stronger than Bobby Fischer (objectively, not relative to his peers as Fischer was better by 60s/70s standards than Nakamura is by today's standards) as his peak is 20 points higher than Fischer's I believe but Magnus is on a whole other level. 

CP6033

wait a second did you just say something about Naka being better than Ficher? the only two people who i think were better than ficher were Kasparov and lasker! maybe even Magnus too, that is saying a lot since i dont' really like magnus

macer75
Pippychess wrote:

he's in the same league - but the bottom of it

lol... great way to put it

Gomer_Pyle
superking500 wrote:

is stronger then Magnus?

I don't even care.

CP6033
macer75 wrote:
Pippychess wrote:

he's in the same league - but the bottom of it

lol... great way to put it

i agree.

zborg

Naka for the cool factor.  Suishi too.  Onward mindless thread!

Don't forget Gata Kamsky.  He's a  great London System player, scoobie doobie doLaughing