Do you think a rating of 2006 at live blitz is a fairly decent rating?

Sort:
LeonSKennedy992

Idk because I see such great players and masters constantly on live chess.

u0110001101101000

Seems you're noticing that once you reach a rating, it's not so impressive anymore. No matter your rating, the players above you are the good ones, and the players below you don't know what they're doing.

The average rating is lower than 2000, so most will consider it good. The "great players and masters" will not consider it very good.

LeonSKennedy992
0110001101101000 wrote:

Seems you're noticing that once you reach a rating, it's not so impressive anymore. No matter your rating, the players above you are the good ones, and the players below you don't know what they're doing.

The average rating is lower than 2000, so most will consider it good. The "great players and masters" will not consider it very good.

what is the average rating?

Pursuantspy
The average rating is "supposed to be " 1200 but its more like 1100 in blitz
solskytz

2006 is super awesome!

u0110001101101000

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/live

Yeah, looks like the blitz average on this site is 1100... not sure this is a great benchmark, but of course 2000 is above average anywhere.

Diakonia
LeonSKennedy992 wrote:

Idk because I see such great players and masters constantly on live chess.

Its an online rating.  It doesnt mean much unless youre a titled player.