is 1100 a good rating

Sort:
Avatar of ChesswithGautham
I dunno. Seems good if you ask me
Avatar of Deranged

Yes, that's a good rating. It makes you better than 78% of people on this site:

Avatar of eric0022
Deranged wrote:

Yes, that's a good rating. It makes you better than 78% of people on this site:

 

 

Probably some of the accounts in the bottom 78.1% are probably inactive ones tallying up to the 78.1% count.

Avatar of TheNameofNames

I dont feel inept at 1100~ the 1100s are mostly easy though i did play like a 30 move game where both i and my opponent played 95 percent accuracy which that game definitely felt like i was hitting a wall but maybe not inept. For us who never really played chess as kids its not that bad of a rating for a relatively new player on here

Avatar of Moonwarrior_1
Deranged wrote:

Yes, that's a good rating. It makes you better than 78% of people on this site:

 

+1

Avatar of EdwinP2017
saintbenidict1 wrote:
I know this may sound stereotypical in a sense, but I just feel inept at this rating. Does anyone else at this rating feel this way?

1100 is not beginner any more but on the lower edge of intermediate. 1100s do not play weird openings like players in the beginner range (sub 1000). They also start to develop tactical ideas. But you can quite easy beat them in the middle game cause of their lack of positional understanding. One move patzers are also still quite common in this range which can change the outcome of the game instantly.

Avatar of Ishant06

ok rating i have 1404 rat

Avatar of ThatGuyNamedJeff

Better then me...

 

 

 

I am pretty sure everyone is better then me tho

Avatar of FudgePackingChessPlayer

pretty loe...

just get better

Avatar of omunzer
Im like pretty low... ):
Avatar of tacticspotter
FudgePackingChessPlayer 写道:

pretty loe...

just get better

First of all

you are 400 rated...

second of all

what tf is wrong with you,what is that status?

Avatar of tacticspotter
AgonizingRook 写道:

So we don't get a say on fourms?

 

What do you mean?

Avatar of tacticspotter
tacticspotter 写道:
AgonizingRook 写道:

So we don't get a say on fourms?

 

What do you mean?

I was replying to someone else

Avatar of tacticspotter
AgonizingRook 写道:

"you are 400 rated..."

 

Check my quote...

I was quoting someone else,check again

Avatar of Vincidroid

Anything is a good rating as long as you're winning.

Avatar of Vincidroid

It's  a good rating, if you're the president of that country. 

Avatar of FudgePackingChessPlayer
tacticspotter wrote:
FudgePackingChessPlayer 写道:

pretty loe...

just get better

First of all

you are 400 rated...

second of all

what tf is wrong with you,what is that status?

stop bullying me

Avatar of SuccMyPawnis
FudgePackingChessPlayer wrote:
tacticspotter wrote:
FudgePackingChessPlayer 写道:

pretty loe...

just get better

First of all

you are 400 rated...

second of all

what tf is wrong with you,what is that status?

stop bullying me

i think anything above 1000 means you're pretty competent, keep up the good work!

Avatar of FudgePackingChessPlayer
SuccMyPawnis wrote:
FudgePackingChessPlayer wrote:
tacticspotter wrote:
FudgePackingChessPlayer 写道:

pretty loe...

just get better

First of all

you are 400 rated...

second of all

what tf is wrong with you,what is that status?

stop bullying me

i think anything above 1000 means you're pretty competent, keep up the good work!

don't be such a fairy

face me in a match.... grin.png

Avatar of ThatGuyNamedJeff

._.