help me please

Sort:
thegreat_patzer
EscherehcsE wrote:

I would suggest the "Magical Response to d4 That Guarantees Black Will Win Every Time" opening. I think I saw it in the latest MCO...

is that the variation with the 9. Qh1! in it?

GodsPawn2016
thegreat_patzer wrote:

what about the beijing double counter gambit; luzorksky variation??

 

also ofc the Caro-Kann  is perfect  against 1.d4

wow, I don't think I've ever seen a more instructive forum. 

That was cool for about 3 months, then someone found the refutation in the deepspace/astronaut attack.  

GodsPawn2016
fluffd wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
fluffd wrote:
Ignore my rating. I tried the e4 opening for 2 years which is obviously what everyone here is going to suggest because of my rating, I play the colle-zukertort as white (high win rate) as black against e4 im like the caro-kann and love the french, past 2 years I have been A LOT better at white, I cant seem to find anything as black against d4, please dont give me openings with 800 pages of theory just for move 3..... thanks in advance

Openings are a choice.  No one can tell YOU what to play.  No i will not ignore your rating, as you have been here  a year and a half.  In that time you have played over 1000 games of blitz, 2 games of standard chess.   

You want people to tell you what openings to play, and yet you dont even follow Opening Principles.  Youre misisng simple tacttics, and hanging pieces.  Openinsg are the least of your concerns regarding improvement.  

But considering this question is asked to death, and youre looking for people to tell you what you want to hear, and not what you need to hear.  Play any opening you want, and good luck.

it turns out im ADD, so before i got my meds i would play instantaneous moves, hence why i play 5 min blitz and only end with 4 min left on it, i got my meds and my performance (irl) (i stuff around online) went up atleast 5x, i understand where you are coming from, but when i picked up the stonewall&cz i started winning more, i knew my plan, i knew the strategy, i didnt lose purely because of my poor opening knowledge/plan, so i honestly just want help.

Understood, but i can only go by what i see from your games.  And nothing in them says youre anywhere near ready to study openings.  

thegreat_patzer
fluffd wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
fluffd wrote:
Ignore my rating. I tried the e4 opening for 2 years which is obviously what everyone here is going to suggest because of my rating, I play the colle-zukertort as white (high win rate) as black against e4 im like the caro-kann and love the french, past 2 years I have been A LOT better at white, I cant seem to find anything as black against d4, please dont give me openings with 800 pages of theory just for move 3..... thanks in advance

Openings are a choice.  No one can tell YOU what to play.  No i will not ignore your rating, as you have been here  a year and a half.  In that time you have played over 1000 games of blitz, 2 games of standard chess.   

You want people to tell you what openings to play, and yet you dont even follow Opening Principles.  Youre misisng simple tacttics, and hanging pieces.  Openinsg are the least of your concerns regarding improvement.  

But considering this question is asked to death, and youre looking for people to tell you what you want to hear, and not what you need to hear.  Play any opening you want, and good luck.

it turns out im ADD, so before i got my meds i would play instantaneous moves, hence why i play 5 min blitz and only end with 4 min left on it, i got my meds and my performance (irl) (i stuff around online) went up atleast 5x, i understand where you are coming from, but when i picked up the stonewall&cz i started winning more, i knew my plan, i knew the strategy, i didnt lose purely because of my poor opening knowledge/plan, so i honestly just want help.

wow op.

I don't even think I could keep my pieces safe at that speed.  my guess is many of us could tear you apart because you're simply rushing yourself. 

 

there's no extra points for getting a whole chess game played in 1 minute.

fluffd
[COMMENT DELETED]
thegreat_patzer
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:

what about the beijing double counter gambit; luzorksky variation??

 

also ofc the Caro-Kann  is perfect  against 1.d4

wow, I don't think I've ever seen a more instructive forum. 

That was cool for about 3 months, then someone found the refutation in the deepspace/astronaut attack.  

crap.

I hate theory.  I guess I need to buy an opening book. or maybe 2,3,4 of them ....tear.png

fluffd
[COMMENT DELETED]
GodsPawn2016
thegreat_patzer wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:

what about the beijing double counter gambit; luzorksky variation??

 

also ofc the Caro-Kann  is perfect  against 1.d4

wow, I don't think I've ever seen a more instructive forum. 

That was cool for about 3 months, then someone found the refutation in the deepspace/astronaut attack.  

crap.

I hate theory.  I guess I need to buy an opening book. or maybe 2,3,4 of them ....

The key to sounding like a cool chess player is the following:

1. Make a lot of posts asking people what opening you should play.

2. Make posts bragging how you know a lot of openings 20 moves deep.

3. Use really cool words like...tactical...agressive...positional...strategic.

This gets the chicks...and youre a hit at chess parties.

thegreat_patzer
fluffd wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:

what about the beijing double counter gambit; luzorksky variation??

 

also ofc the Caro-Kann  is perfect  against 1.d4

wow, I don't think I've ever seen a more instructive forum. 

im sorry, i wasnt clear my bad, im more of a positional / technical / quiet player hence why i have never played a gambit (except to lose as much pieces as possible by trolling (it was unrated vs my friend)

Isnt the caro vs d4 the slav ?

lol.

you gotta try to keep op.

 

you can't play the Caro against 1d4.  if you did it wouldn't be the Caro (aka Caro-Kann).

 

the big secret here is ...

(the words don't matter!)

 

but ah, we digress.  you are surely welcome to try to improve (in chess) any way that makes sense to you (even if it doesn't make sense to us).

 

thegreat_patzer
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:

what about the beijing double counter gambit; luzorksky variation??

 

also ofc the Caro-Kann  is perfect  against 1.d4

wow, I don't think I've ever seen a more instructive forum. 

That was cool for about 3 months, then someone found the refutation in the deepspace/astronaut attack.  

crap.

I hate theory.  I guess I need to buy an opening book. or maybe 2,3,4 of them ....

The key to sounding like a cool chess player is the following:

1. Make a lot of posts asking people what opening you should play.

2. Make posts bragging how you know a lot of openings 20 moves deep.

3. Use really cool words like...tactical...agressive...positional...strategic.

This gets the chicks...and youre a hit at chess parties.

oh

did you know?

i'm both tactical AND a positional player.  that makes me like double-cool.

anyways pm me and I can share a few secrets...

GodsPawn2016
thegreat_patzer wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:

what about the beijing double counter gambit; luzorksky variation??

 

also ofc the Caro-Kann  is perfect  against 1.d4

wow, I don't think I've ever seen a more instructive forum. 

That was cool for about 3 months, then someone found the refutation in the deepspace/astronaut attack.  

crap.

I hate theory.  I guess I need to buy an opening book. or maybe 2,3,4 of them ....

The key to sounding like a cool chess player is the following:

1. Make a lot of posts asking people what opening you should play.

2. Make posts bragging how you know a lot of openings 20 moves deep.

3. Use really cool words like...tactical...agressive...positional...strategic.

This gets the chicks...and youre a hit at chess parties.

oh

did you know?

i'm both tactical AND a positional player.  that makes me like double-cool.

anyways pm me and I can share a few secrets...

PLEASE....tactical/agressive is so yesterday.  Im a Positionally Agressive player, and thats where its at!

GodsPawn2016

To the OP:

In all seriousness.  How is anyone supposed to help you?  You give nothing but excuses as to why your online games are so bad, you give no games indicating your true strength (according to you).  But your biggest give-a-way that you are a beginner was when you started using phrases like "positional / technical / quiet player"  

If you truley want help then just be honest in your ability.  

fluffd
[COMMENT DELETED]
fluffd
[COMMENT DELETED]
EscherehcsE
fluffd wrote:

as usual the cruel community trolls me, thanks jerks

A thousand pardons for my trollish post. However, look at it from our point of view. You were given serious responses/suggestions, which you ignored. After that, what are we to do?

fluffd
[COMMENT DELETED]
lofina_eidel_ismail

why does it always have to be (1) get better at chess opennings

                                           (2) get better at being cool

                                           (3) get better chicks and parties

fluffd
[COMMENT DELETED]
thegreat_patzer

 no not trolls. Jokes. 

the point is that what your looking for will not help you in the long run.

 

and you could have gotten all kinds of named openings of d4 either here on chess.com or off the net.

so why have you asked us?  could it be that you wanted to know how to play the opening better??

well if so. you don't need a name.

 

you need to understand HOW to open a chess game. memorizing is WRONG.

all that advice to study theory is WRONG.  going to youtube and trying to memorize how a master would play semi-slav is WRONG.

 

...

also FWIW and BTW...

you did get a name.  semislav.

GodsPawn2016
lofina_eidel_ismail wrote:

why does it always have to be (1) get better at chess opennings

                                           (2) get better at being cool

                                           (3) get better chicks and parties

Because if i had a nickel everytime a beginner posted "What opening should i play?" and then throws in the dead give-a-way "I'm a position/quiet/etc. player"  That right there tells you, they arent serious about improving.  And on top of all that the OP makes up excuse after excuse why his chess.com games are so bad.