I am probably the best chessplayer on chess.com

Sort:
MervinHenderson

I have always said rating isn't everything. There were many very low rated genius players like tarrash and nimowitch. I'm one of those. My rating is no indication of my real playing strength. To really see how good I am you ought to check out my brilliant tactical and positional ideas. Amazing ones. Better than Hikaru. 

 

JCGUY777
Really? Play me! I am a fan of Hikaru because he is a well rounded player. I would like you to see you survive the Arctic defence or Barnes Hammerschlag maneuver.
JCGUY777
An excellent GM knows all the openings and can play anything.
JCGUY777
But still mastering maybe just a few to a really high level.
constantcucumber
MervinHenderson wrote:

I have always said rating isn't everything. There were many very low rated genius players like tarrash and nimowitch. I'm one of those. My rating is no indication of my real playing strength. To really see how good I am you ought to check out my brilliant tactical and positional ideas. Amazing ones. Better than Hikaru. 

 

It's a troll

 

✅Joined 5 hours ago

✅Weird name

✅Ridiculous thread

 

More but I'm too lazy

nTzT

You joined 5 hours ago just to troll on the forums. Boring.

sfxe
happypi314 wrote:
MervinHenderson wrote:

I have always said rating isn't everything. There were many very low rated genius players like tarrash and nimowitch. I'm one of those. My rating is no indication of my real playing strength. To really see how good I am you ought to check out my brilliant tactical and positional ideas. Amazing ones. Better than Hikaru. 

 

It's a troll

 

✅Joined 5 hours ago

✅Weird name

✅Ridiculous thread

 

More but I'm too lazy

^^

show some creativity man

don't just do the usual "im the best player on chess.com blah blah blah"

thats what common trolls do SMH

nTzT

Worst troll ever with the most obvious bait. 

MervinHenderson
kingattacker3 wrote:

I have to at least give you credit for being bold enough to claim that.  Magnus Carlsen even have never said that. 

Just saying rating isn't everything. Many famous masters had very low Elo ratings. I don't think something as complex as chess can be measured by something like a rating. You can't measure smartness with a measuring scale 

Siddharth20112014

You are NOT

MervinHenderson

https://www.chess.com/live#g=6394425432

That game says it all! 

Siddharth20112014

That Game Does Not say it all

MervinHenderson

https://www.chess.com/live#g=6394486502

 

And another middle game stategucal brilliancy 

MervinHenderson
Siddharth20112014 wrote:

That Game Does Not say it all

Yes it does and so does this one 

https://www.chess.com/live#g=6394486502

Brilliant strategical middlegame play

Siddharth20112014

NO!NO!

MervinHenderson
PatheticStudent wrote:

That is nothing now you see my best wins

Daily960

Bullet'

Blitz

 

Not bad at all quite nice 

MervinHenderson
PatheticStudent wrote:

also I drew 2300+daily960 player

well i was losing some why he offered draw

You have a good rating but be warned rating isn't everything. You got to be like positional and tactical and able to see moves ahead that's what matters not rating. 

Siddharth20112014

Sorry I am reffering to MervinHenderson

MervinHenderson

Oki doki

PunchboxNET
This is now a bragging forum about best wins and stuff. If @MervinHenderson was seriously playing chess, then he wouldn’t have time to post stuff on silly forums.