I AM SO FED UP

Sort:
corrijean

Occam's razor.

kco

"Occam's razor" ?

corrijean

The simplest explanation is the most likely to be correct.

theoreticalboy

Yes, I'm a fan of Occam's razor, and qui bono arguments, too.

ilikeflags

i used to like bono a lot more when he was a punk kid

chugga

kfnikjfhviksdbngvkdbngvoikldnfoklahsndfkajhfksahdfk;jhsakbfvksafbksafndkhfksahdfkashnkfakfkf

text:fjlaskfj

Now I made a text nobody understands to describe something nobody understands, THANKS A LOT CHEss.com

PS: speel cheique was used in the making of this comment

ozzie_c_cobblepot
Ooh dose, love them.
checkmateibeatu

Now I am nearly 100% sure that chessnetowrkfan was banned.  Now I discovered that there was a thread in the past, deleted after one post, called "Ban checkmateibeatu or I Troll", which I suspect was from him, since his account is closed, as well as he said that he was "1 day from going into TROLL mode", also he wrote many notes in a short period saying, "F*** YOU YOU MANCHILD C***!",or something because I didn't agree that one of my haters and ozzie_c_cobblepot were sexually frusterated.  Due to those three immsense violations of the site's-as well as common sense's- rules (in ONE DAY), he alsmost surely got banned.  I must, however, he rode the fense very nicely [added me as a friend and then called one of my haters sexually frusterated (I don't agree with it by any means, but it made him appear to be on my side), and then requested a banishment of me].

DISCLAIMER: I do not stand for his riding the fense behavior, nor do I stand for his calling those two sexually frusterated, nor do I stand for what he said to and about me.

theoreticalboy

So, you're going to give a guy credit who made low-brow comments about people's sexual behaviour and littered the site with abject expletives, on the grounds that he added you as a friend?  That's sweet of you.

kco

that is must be the longest post I've seen from you cmibu. Do I have to read all that ? I don't have time for that.

checkmateibeatu
theoreticalboy wrote:

So, you're going to give a guy credit who made low-brow comments about people's sexual behaviour and littered the site with abject expletives, on the grounds that he added you as a friend?  That's sweet of you.


Nope, I am giving him credit for something I don't do, but he did good at, very good at that.  Regardless, I do not stand for that behavior at all.

checkmateibeatu
kco wrote:

that is must be the longest post I've seen from you cmibu. Do I have to read all that ? I don't have time for that.


I am not forcing you to.

theoreticalboy

...why on earth would you give him any credit for such schizophrenic behaviour?

checkmateibeatu
theoreticalboy wrote:

...why on earth would you give him any credit for such schizophrenic behaviour?


Maybe I shouldn't word it that way.

checkmateibeatu
checkmateibeatu wrote:

Now I am nearly 100% sure that chessnetowrkfan was banned.  Now I discovered that there was a thread in the past, deleted after one post, called "Ban checkmateibeatu or I Troll", which I suspect was from him, since his account is closed, as well as he said that he was "1 day from going into TROLL mode", also he wrote many notes in a short period saying, "F*** YOU YOU MANCHILD C***!",or something because I didn't agree that one of my haters and ozzie_c_copplepot were sexually frusterated.  Due to those three immsense violations of the site's-as well as common sense's- rules (in ONE DAY), he alsmost surely got banned.  I must, however, he rode the fense very nicely [added me as a friend and then called one of my haters sexually frusterated (I don't agree with it by any means, but it made him appear to be on my side), and then requested a banishment of me].

DISCLAIMER: I do not stand for his riding the fense behavior, nor do I stand for his calling those two sexually frusterated, nor do I stand for what he said to and about me.


There ya go.

ozzie_c_cobblepot

Dude, please spell my name correctly.

checkmateibeatu
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

Dude, please spell my name correctly.


It's fixed now.

ozzie_c_cobblepot
checkmateibeatu wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:

Now I am nearly 100% sure that chessnetowrkfan was banned.  Now I discovered that there was a thread in the past, deleted after one post, called "Ban checkmateibeatu or I Troll", which I suspect was from him, since his account is closed, as well as he said that he was "1 day from going into TROLL mode", also he wrote many notes in a short period saying, "F*** YOU YOU MANCHILD C***!",or something because I didn't agree that one of my haters and ozzie_c_copplepot were sexually frusterated.  Due to those three immsense violations of the site's-as well as common sense's- rules (in ONE DAY), he alsmost surely got banned.  I must, however, he rode the fense very nicely [added me as a friend and then called one of my haters sexually frusterated (I don't agree with it by any means, but it made him appear to be on my side), and then requested a banishment of me].

DISCLAIMER: I do not stand for his riding the fense behavior, nor do I stand for his calling those two sexually frusterated, nor do I stand for what he said to and about me.


There ya go.


No it's not.

checkmateibeatu
ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:

Now I am nearly 100% sure that chessnetowrkfan was banned.  Now I discovered that there was a thread in the past, deleted after one post, called "Ban checkmateibeatu or I Troll", which I suspect was from him, since his account is closed, as well as he said that he was "1 day from going into TROLL mode", also he wrote many notes in a short period saying, "F*** YOU YOU MANCHILD C***!",or something because I didn't agree that one of my haters and ozzie_c_copplepot were sexually frusterated.  Due to those three immsense violations of the site's-as well as common sense's- rules (in ONE DAY), he alsmost surely got banned.  I must, however, he rode the fense very nicely [added me as a friend and then called one of my haters sexually frusterated (I don't agree with it by any means, but it made him appear to be on my side), and then requested a banishment of me].

DISCLAIMER: I do not stand for his riding the fense behavior, nor do I stand for his calling those two sexually frusterated, nor do I stand for what he said to and about me.


There ya go.


No it's not.


That was directed at the people who thought I stood for his actions.

ozzie_c_cobblepot

When I wrote "No it's not." I meant that you hadn't corrected all of your spelling errors.