if you know

---

...and this happened on page 13.

So, here's my answer, Tonydal: No. Nope, no no no. This couldn't be the end. Absolutely. Not at all.

Oh. I guess I'm too late anyway. You'd probably figured it out yourself already...

Hey, kurogkug, did you read my post about how to quote?

Did it work?

I wait for your answer.

thank you borgqueen.and to bgangioni my answer is no because i think its hard thing to do,im little bit behind when it comes to computer staff.

Ok, kurogkug. I know it can be a little bit overwhelming for people who aren't used to using computers.

But, can you do just one thing for me? Clic the link that says quote. This one:

Then, you'll get this:

 

Can you see the gray zone with the comment you just quoted? You can write your answer (or question, for that matter) under that.

---

Your arrow may have been slightly displaced, as it is pointing in the area above the horizontal rule but below the quote box. You actually can't type anything there (you can, however delete the bar if you like).

thank you bgangioni and borgqueen,you guys are a life saver.

OK kurogkug, let's see you do a quote just to show you understood.

---

ok i got it guys.

i got it guys thank you again.

Congratulations guys.  You saved his damn life!

Wow! I can't believe you actually did it! Move up to the top of the class!

---

thank you borgueen.i just practicing this staff.

---

yeah i got again!!!!.yahoooooooooo!!!!!!!!!.thank you guys.

Now you can go to page 1 of your own thread and start quoting all those posts that you wanted to quote before!

---

 That looked like so much fun I thought I would try it too! It's a blast!

finally i got it guys in too many attempts,thank you again.hi borgqueen i have a question to you again,in playing chess what you gonna choose a horse or a bishop?.i mean when im playing chess i like not to take my horse with my opponent or i rather to exchange my bishop to the horse of my opponent,because for me the horse is much stronger than bishop because the horse can move a lot than to bishop,and because bishop can only move diagonally right?.so what is your oppinion about this borgqueen?,what you gonna choose?.i wait again to your response borgqueen.

It's called a Knight, not a horse.

I've come late to this discussion, but i have to disagree with this post of yours. A plan may my fail or succeed based on the execution of tactics and strategy by the soldiers, but the strategy itself is unchanged. It is decided before the fact based on conditions and desired results. In a practical sense the soundness of the strategy I suppose exists as a sort of alter ego in dialectical opposition to the tactics...in real time, each shifting based on the truth of observable outcomes. ............................................................................?..................................................................... BorgQueen wrote: Pretty much, but it isn't really to do with the first two words.  English is not that rigid. "The outstanding effort made by the troopers contributed greatly towards the overall strategy of the general" There is a statement that indicates strategic effort even thought the words are further apart and not word 1 or word 2.

The choice of using knights or bishops depends on the possible strategy that can be used during a game and is not a fixed tactic or strategy.