I'm still here....watching

Sort:
Queenie
jtun23 wrote: cheater_1 wrote:

A GIRL!....girls cant play chess, at least very well. Polgar is a slight exception.

TRUE STORY:  DID I tell you all the one about when I got Booted from an INTERNET chat session with Judit POLGAR. There must have been about100 or so people typing her questions. My infamous question that got me Banned from the chat room was this: "JUDIT, is there any truth that you will be posing in Penthouse with your sister NAKED on the bed playing chess." I asked that question and several seconds later my screen went white. POOF. I was gone. That's what gets me off. That's how I operate. Even Ms. POLGAR has experienced the one and only cheater_1.


 You got booted because it was a silly childish question.  Thats the one and only reason.  I sence you a true wierdo, possibly a dangerous, perverted, twisted individual.  A weak mind who cant even apply himself to win a game of chess without cheating.  A man of no will is a dangerous man.  You are a weak minded fool, do not even bother to reply to my comments here, I'm not interested.  I am sure you will respond because you just can't resist your urge you sicko.


jtun23, I think your wrong to judge Cheater on all counts. Why do I say that, if yu have been following the latest posting, you would see that my comment about him not being a man at all, (look at his picture, small feature's, tiny hand, earring in left ear), touched a nerve, I really do think cheater is a girl, some of her terminolgy points towards her being a girl as well. As for being sick, no she's not sick, either she is having a right old laugh, with at the strong feeling's she stirs up, or she is just a VSP,( very sad person). One clue: she says girls can't play chess ----- and she never plays. 


silentfilmstar13
RetGuvvie98 wrote: jay wrote:

apples are sometimes redish in color.


In a technically substantive sense:   

 

jay, more correctly, apples "APPEAR" reddish in color, not because they are actually reddish, but because they reflect the reddish wavelengths of light and are therefore perceived (by most humans*) to have a red color.     We call them red or reddish, when actually, they are every color except red.  They absorb all the wavelengths of light that would allow us to perceive them as any other color, reflecting only the red or reddish wavelengths, and that results in a commonly accepted perception of calling them red.

 

What you call them, does not necessarily mean that they are that, it is merely what you call them.

 

(*:    Cheaters and color-blind humans might have quite different perceptions - cheaters see only facets they choose, color-blind humans see only those features they can see.  there is a difference.) 

 

there, how is that for substance and not fluff???

 

tunatin, can I have a cup of tea as well?  green tea please.  

thanks.  that's better.  


 I believe that is what it is to be red; to reflect everything but.  Our perception of the reflections, and our own mental constructions of the data sent from our eyes I consider the defining characteristics of an objects color.


jtun23
kohai wrote: jtun23,  all you know of cheater_1 is what you have read on these forums. You use strong words to condemn a man you have never met and probably never spoken with. Yet, you still take it upon yourself to judge others... interesting.

 you have your opinion and I have mine.  He obviously is a sad individual and if you can't see that then more fool you.  I wouldnt want to meet or talk to this saddo.  Also I have not condemened anybody, he is still free to be whatever freak he wants to be.


jtun23
Sunshiny wrote: queenie wrote:

I been looking closely at Cheater's photograph, who thinks he's a girl?...... I do......

Look at the delicate fetures, and tiny hands. Plus s/he is wearing an earing in her left ear lobe. 


 I haven't looked at Cheater's photo, but at one point when i was looking at Cheater's avatar, i began to think that it's someone in disguise and that person could be female!


 this is not a photo...its an image from the interent


Queenie
jtun23 wrote: Sunshiny wrote: queenie wrote:

I been looking closely at Cheater's photograph, who thinks he's a girl?...... I do......

Look at the delicate fetures, and tiny hands. Plus s/he is wearing an earing in her left ear lobe. 


 I haven't looked at Cheater's photo, but at one point when i was looking at Cheater's avatar, i began to think that it's someone in disguise and that person could be female!


 this is not a photo...its an image from the interent


How do u know? Are u cheater? 


chessis4coolppl
cheater_1 wrote:

A GIRL!....girls cant play chess, at least very well. Polgar is a slight exception.

TRUE STORY:  DID I tell you all the one about when I got Booted from an INTERNET chat session with Judit POLGAR. There must have been about100 or so people typing her questions. My infamous question that got me Banned from the chat room was this: "JUDIT, is there any truth that you will be posing in Penthouse with your sister NAKED on the bed playing chess." I asked that question and several seconds later my screen went white. POOF. I was gone. That's what gets me off. That's how I operate. Even Ms. POLGAR has experienced the one and only cheater_1. 


 I have two words to say to you, but I will not say on chess.com. You are an egomaniac but for only one reason! You cheat to play chess. Are we supposed to see the complex and genius person inside of you by only hearing about how you cheat? Am I supposed to envy you? Am I supposed to pity you getting booted from an internet chat session because you asked an immature perverted question? Complex person? Ha! You are one of the most simplistic individuals I have ever had the displeasure of talking to. You started this only because you are starved for attention. And I am sad to say we are giving it to you.


hinmanhouse
kohai wrote: jtun23 wrote: kohai wrote: jtun23,  all you know of cheater_1 is what you have read on these forums. You use strong words to condemn a man you have never met and probably never spoken with. Yet, you still take it upon yourself to judge others... interesting.

 you have your opinion and I have mine.  He obviously is a sad individual and if you can't see that then more fool you.  I wouldnt want to meet or talk to this saddo.  Also I have not condemened anybody, he is still free to be whatever freak he wants to be.


 Yes  i have opinions, and yes you are entitled to yours.. perhaps i am more of a fool, but atleast i am not judgemental or verbally nasty to people i don't know.


Actually, I've noticed a number of your posts, and you seem to do quite a bit of telling other people how to behave and are often quite rude and mother-superiorish.  I'm sure we could get by without so much of your guidance.


jtun23
Rael wrote:

 

Hinmanhouse

 

I haven't seen many of your posts. It's because you haven't been very involved, nor do you speak for the community at large.

 

Everyone brings to the table who they are. People enjoy Pedro, and Dalmatinac and Ret and whomever else for both their contributions and their quirks. Kohai is no different. She feels that she's doing something to help out, actually, and yeah, maybe she can come off as a bit overzealous about it, but it's well-intentioned.

 

You comment smacks with hypocrisy... let me use your words: "you seem to do quite a bit of telling other people how to behave and are often quite rude and mother-superiorish.  I'm sure we could get by without so much of your guidance."

 

First off, I'm certain you haven't been around along enough to use the plural "we" when you speak. And maybe she is a bit motherly, and maybe she does go out to give some guidance. Women her age can be like that sometimes. But as far as I'm concerned, she's just as much a part of the community as everyone else here, and I know personally that your comments have hurt her - maybe you're just being flippant on the web, right? - but I'll at least put in my two cents for her defense and say that her kind and sensible guidance is very much welcome here.

 

Thank you very much sir. 

 


This sounds very clicky.  Am I or any other person stepping on toes when I or any other person posts in a forum?!?!  This isnt your home, I or any other person hasn't intruded on your land.  Get off your high horse and let others have their say.  You mention the community as if it was your gang, if it is to be a gang then I wear my colours with pride...gold, which gives me or any other person in the same sitch the right to speak...the right to reply


jtun23
kohai wrote:

my comment was to jtun not you.

I'm sorry if thats how i come across, its certainly not done intentionally.

Thanks for putting me in my place, i'll certainly watch what and where i post in future. 


 pathetic


silentfilmstar13
Is it getting hot in here?
oginschile
I love my marshmallow mateys.
hinmanhouse
Rael wrote:

 

Hinmanhouse

 

I haven't seen many of your posts. It's because you haven't been very involved, nor do you speak for the community at large.

 

Everyone brings to the table who they are. People enjoy Pedro, and Dalmatinac and Ret and whomever else for both their contributions and their quirks. Kohai is no different. She feels that she's doing something to help out, actually, and yeah, maybe she can come off as a bit overzealous about it, but it's well-intentioned.

 

You comment smacks with hypocrisy... let me use your words: "you seem to do quite a bit of telling other people how to behave and are often quite rude and mother-superiorish.  I'm sure we could get by without so much of your guidance."

 

First off, I'm certain you haven't been around along enough to use the plural "we" when you speak. And maybe she is a bit motherly, and maybe she does go out to give some guidance. Women her age can be like that sometimes. But as far as I'm concerned, she's just as much a part of the community as everyone else here, and I know personally that your comments have hurt her - maybe you're just being flippant on the web, right? - but I'll at least put in my two cents for her defense and say that her kind and sensible guidance is very much welcome here.

 

Thank you very much sir. 

 


Obviously I was addressing the wrong mother superior.  So glad we have vets like you around to tell us all when we're being naughty.  Good luck on getting your panties out of that bunch.


JRadis

why are you posting here? Of what I have read you are not a chessplayer your a computerfreak. Computerprogrammer if you like. Anyway this site is for chesspayers, people who playes chess not for persons programming computers. So why not leaving this site for the real chessplayers?


TheOldReb
Can't we all just get along ?! Laughing
Evil_Homer
I “Vote” this as bitc, oh sorry, can’t use that word or Retguvvie will be on to  me again, so tetchiest thread on Chess.com!!!

 



Meemo
itaibn wrote: Meemo wrote:

Dammit, I appear to have been gravitationally attracted to this forum by the sheer mass of posts.

How do I get out?


In page 7, we're planning on building a spaceship so that people like you can escape. Your room will be room A45. Please wait patiently until this topic will get 7 pages, and then takeoff will happen ASAP. Enjoy your stay (or try to)!


 Thanks itaibn, we're on page 7 now, any chance you've finished that rocket ship?


StacyBearden

This is now officially an "add a word to make a story" thread! YEA!

 

Here's the first word...

 

"Graciously..."

 

GO! 


Rael

 

Graciously thanking...

 

(next word should be Stacy)


Vulpoon
Does anyone know a good nuclear scientist? I need one to enrich the uranium I have, must blow up nyc....
Evil_Homer

for stopping producing lists?