streetfighter wrote:
'your lawyer' Mr Blunderful
Ah. Well, that's as close to clever as you've been able to manage, so it will have to do.
Is chess conceptually flawed?
Sort:
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
^ lol if you can't see how he was provoked,you are blind.
lol
"Advertisements for your book are off-topic."
"Off-topic? You ****** *****, go *** *** and ****, then *** ****** ***** it ***** ****. ****!"
Dec 18, 2011
0
#44
streetfighter wrote: ought to have done it via a PM (or a house-call )
Another instance of a tough guy behind a keyboard. 
chessoholicalien wrote:
wow, I'm beginning to wish I hadn't asked...
Get used to it (you'll have that feeling a lot around here). 
Dec 18, 2011
0
#46
If you want a shorter/ more brutal game you can try Seirawan Chess: there are two extra queens, the hawk and the elephant
http://www.zillions-of-games.com/cgi-bin/zilligames/submissions.cgi
Dec 18, 2011
0
#47
ooohhh! ooohhh! Gosh, he really is a streetfighter! What a stud! And your YouTube post of you beating up a 51-year-old guy who uses a cane for knee arthritis would be sure to buff up your street cred!
uri65 wrote:
chessoholicalien wrote:
I'm just querying why it seems so relatively difficult to win a game of chess in the middlegame, almost as if it was meant to be that way
But you c the best defense is offense so y do we not always win or lose where does a draw come in
Because for every Art of Attack there is Art of Defence. It's a well balanced game.
Dec 18, 2011
0
#49
Excellent thread, overall! It unfolds kind of like love...if love had an entirely different meaning
Good drinking and smoking thread
Lol, you never mess with a Uper Streetfighter.
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
^ lol if you can't see how he was provoked,you are blind.
This is exactly why i don't take forums anywhere seriously. Bunch of trolls and goodie too shoes who obide by the "rules" when it's obvious not a single flock is given by anyone,including the mods.
it's rad how you keep telling everyone how much you don't care what anyone here thinks of you. once would've been enough for a person who really couldn't care less.
lol what a pansy. Get a life you sock sniffer.
What kind of socks are we sniffing? Knee-high socks?
Dec 18, 2011
0
#52
Conquistador wrote:
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
lol what a pansy. Get a life you sock sniffer.
What kind of socks are we sniffing? Knee-high socks?
In miss congeniality's case that would definitely be approaching foul territory.
Hm, this could shape up to be quite a bout!
In this corner, we have that doughty yooper CystemPhailure, just getting back from his daily hunt:
And here's streetfighter, reminiscing with a mate of his about auld lang buttkicks:
Cystem_Phailure wrote:
Conquistador wrote:
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
lol what a pansy. Get a life you sock sniffer.
What kind of socks are we sniffing? Knee-high socks?
In miss congeniality's case that would definitely be approaching foul territory.
He is the one wearing the socks? Oooooo...I just going to be...uh...over here (gets up and sits at a different table).
AndyClifton wrote:
Hm, this could shape up to be quite a bout!
In this corner, we have that doughty yooper CystemPhailure, just getting back from his daily hunt:
And here's streetfighter, reminiscing with a mate of his about auld lang buttkicks:
That is a real small deer for Michigan; it probably is a runt.
Dec 18, 2011
0
#56
Conquistador wrote:
That is a real small deer for Michigan; it probably is a runt.
Maybe that's the biggest he can transport in that manner.
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
You seem pretty ignorant of the origins of chess so let me educate you so that you don't ask silly questions anymore:
Dec 18, 2011
0
#58
streetfighter wrote:
Those guys are wearing Tottenham shirts! Wrong country!
Like the rest of the world cares.
It seems to me that the point of chess is to lead to the endgame. The point is to make a strategy that lasts until the ending.
^ lol if you can't see how he was provoked,you are blind.
Hmmm . . . there doesn't seem to be a single instance of anyone indicating they wondered whether or how he was provoked . . . who is that response for?