Is it okay to move a knight parallel to the king's bishop so that the rook can escape past the row o

Sort:
Avatar of LeonSKennedy992

Or is this not possible under the current rules of the game of chess as it stands in the current moment.

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

cant believe that a 2100-rated player can't compose a chess-related sentence in a way that is AT ALL understandable. Can ANYONE please translate what this snob just said?

Avatar of LeonSKennedy992
piya_is_my_name wrote:

cant believe that a 2100-rated player can't compose a chess-related sentence in a way that is AT ALL understandable. Can ANYONE please translate what this snob just said?

Composing sentences is not at all related the current question currently in question above that I wrote so please look above and read the question that I wrote again and help me find an answer 

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

I canno underatand its meaning, sorry. I cannot believe there is something that you don't know! In that other thread, you made yourself sound like you're sime chess god or something.

Avatar of LeonSKennedy992
piya_is_my_name wrote:

I canno underatand its meaning, sorry. I cannot believe there is something that you don't know! In that other thread, you made yourself sound like you're sime chess god or something.

lol

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

I dont think you understand the concept of two objects being parallel to each other, to begin with. Did you go to school at all? How is this possible, that there ia such a person on Earth?! I was right: you should just kill yourself - there is no hope for you.

Avatar of LeonSKennedy992
piya_is_my_name wrote:

I dont think you understand the concept of two objects being parallel to each other, to begin with. Did you go to school at all? How is this possible, that there ia such a person on Earth?! I was right: you should just kill yourself - there is no hope for you.

It is not surprising that an unattractive female is so triggered by an obvious joke topic.

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

turning this into joke won't work, after what you said in that other thread. just wait until those others opposing you see all this. time somebody laugh you out the room. fyi, i am hot as fuck. this picture serves me no justice. you would eat my shit without hesitation if i asked you.

Avatar of punchy_mcbam
LeonSKennedy992 wrote:
piya_is_my_name wrote:

I dont think you understand the concept of two objects being parallel to each other, to begin with. Did you go to school at all? How is this possible, that there ia such a person on Earth?! I was right: you should just kill yourself - there is no hope for you.

It is not surprising that an unattractive female is so triggered by an obvious joke topic.

Leon, apparently you are supposed to “kill yourself” over a chess forum. oh, the humanity! Some classy stuff there piya, geez...

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

Keith, why dont you read that other fat-titled thread of his first (it should be right near this one), and see how he actually treats "your kind" - maybe you'll come here and retract what you said.

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

bump

Avatar of BandOfGypsys000

piya_is_my_name wrote:

bump

what a classy chick

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

bump

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

voodoochile666666 wrote:

piya_is_my_name wrote:

bump

what a classy chick

What did you mean by this?

Avatar of LeonSKennedy992
piya_is_my_name wrote:
voodoochile666666 wrote:
piya_is_my_name wrote:

bump

what a classy chick

What did you mean by this?

He means that you are not a very classy chick.  He is using sarcasm.  If you need more help understanding the intricacies of the english language, don't hesitate to let me know.  I would be happy to help you, my dear.

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

LeonSKennedy992 wrote:

piya_is_my_name wrote:
voodoochile666666 wrote:
piya_is_my_name wrote:

bump

what a classy chick

What did you mean by this?

He means that you are not a very classy chick.  He is using sarcasm.  If you need more help understanding the intricacies of the english language, don't hesitate to let me know.  I would be happy to help you, my dear.

i knew; just didnt want to predume. whatever... two snobs equiped with sarcasm without ability to craft a question in their own language, and not knowing a basic concept of parallel objects, offering to teach me english... LOL go work on your rating, snob. another 1000 or so games might bump you all the way to 2025

Avatar of LaskerCompensation
piya_is_my_name wrote:

cant believe that a 2100-rated player can't compose a chess-related sentence in a way that is AT ALL understandable. Can ANYONE please translate what this snob just said?

First of all, if you critisize other peoples behavior you shouldn't do the same yourself.

While  I'm not agreeing with LeonSKennedy I'm not calling him names or something. 

I would just respond politely to his statements and questions no matter how I disagree with him.

 

Your  behavior isn't appropiate because nothing in this thread indicates that he is a "snob". You shouldn't bring something like this up if this is a simple chess related question. 

You can critisize him in that other thread because it is about the topic you're talking about. But even there there is no need to insult other people.

If you know what your values are then there is always a way to find the right words to defend your view and show people why you are possibly right. Just calling people "snobs" and "arrogant pricks" doesn't help to create a friendly community. 

 

Avatar of LaskerCompensation
LeonSKennedy992 wrote:

Or is this not possible under the current rules of the game of chess as it stands in the current moment.

Now back to the topic. You have to provide more information because you didn't give us much details to understand the question.

This is what I understand from moving the knight parallel to the bishop.

The knight is now parallel to the bishop. However, this doesn't allow the rook to change its row but its column.

Also it would be helpful if you explain to us why you asked this question? What do you exactly want to know? If you can rephrase the question it would be really helpful.

Avatar of piya_is_my_name

LaskerCompensation wrote:

piya_is_my_name wrote:

cant believe that a 2100-rated player can't compose a chess-related sentence in a way that is AT ALL understandable. Can ANYONE please translate what this snob just said?

First of all, if you critisize other peoples behavior you shouldn't do the same yourself.

While  I'm not agreeing with LeonSKennedy I'm not calling him names or something. 

I would just respond politely to his statements and questions no matter how I disagree with him.

 

Your  behavior isn't appropiate because nothing in this thread indicates that he is a "snob". You shouldn't bring something like this up if this is a simple chess related question. 

You can critisize him in that other thread because it is about the topic you're talking about. But even there there is no need to insult other people.

If you know what your values are then there is always a way to find the right words to defend your view and show people why you are possibly right. Just calling people "snobs" and "arrogant pricks" doesn't help to create a friendly community. 

 

I'm going to pseudo-quote someone, who said this today, on these forums: what you just said is comparable to saying how mussolini was a saint because he once volunteered at soup kitchen. the dude is a snob, and here's why (although you already confirmed being familiar): https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/i-dont-understand-how-people-with-below-1000-ratings-after-hundreds-of-games-just-dont-quit- He brought this to himself: you cant go around insulting people then come back the safety of your village (this thread) and expect utmost respect. he's a slime. I doubt his question makes sense to anyone, not even you. please enlighten me, and answer it, you highly-rated player, you. Im making fun of him, yes, with pleasure. Im only insulting those that directly insult me first: "rewind" and see.

Avatar of LaskerCompensation
piya_is_my_name wrote:
LaskerCompensation wrote:
piya_is_my_name wrote:

cant believe that a 2100-rated player can't compose a chess-related sentence in a way that is AT ALL understandable. Can ANYONE please translate what this snob just said?

First of all, if you critisize other peoples behavior you shouldn't do the same yourself.

While  I'm not agreeing with LeonSKennedy I'm not calling him names or something. 

I would just respond politely to his statements and questions no matter how I disagree with him.

 

Your  behavior isn't appropiate because nothing in this thread indicates that he is a "snob". You shouldn't bring something like this up if this is a simple chess related question. 

You can critisize him in that other thread because it is about the topic you're talking about. But even there there is no need to insult other people.

If you know what your values are then there is always a way to find the right words to defend your view and show people why you are possibly right. Just calling people "snobs" and "arrogant pricks" doesn't help to create a friendly community. 

 

I'm going to pseudo-quote someone, who said this today, on these forums: what you just said is comparable to saying how mussolini was a saint because he once volunteered at soup kitchen. the dude is a snob, and here's why (although you already confirmed being familiar): https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/i-dont-understand-how-people-with-below-1000-ratings-after-hundreds-of-games-just-dont-quit- He brought this to himself: you cant go around insulting people then come back the safety of your village (this thread) and expect utmost respect. he's a slime. I doubt his question makes sense to anyone, not even you. please enlighten me, and answer it, you highly-rated player, you. Im making fun of him, yes, with pleasure. Im only insulting those that directly insult me first: "rewind" and see.

I agree with you that this question doesn't make any sense and is probably not meant to be serious but I'm just hoping he would explain himself. If this thread turns out to be a troll thread then I see no reason to post anything in here.

Would you hate a friend, random person or family member until the end of your life just because they made one single mistake or have an opinion you don't agree with? Isn''t it a chance to connect with eachother and solve the problems you have with that person and in the end get closer?

That Mussolini example isn't a good example. He was a dictator and did a lot of horrible things. 

LeonSKennedy just has an opinion we don't agree with (talking about the ouher thread). But there is no reason to attack him for that but to provide constructive critisism.

If this doesn't help you can just ignore his threads.

 

Just keep it friendly, guys no matter what!

 

Have a great day and don't forget to smile! happy.png