Man vs. Machine
I FEEL that we can overtake them again in future.
FEELings, nothing more than FEELings....
I FEEL that we can overtake them again in future.
FEELings, nothing more than FEELings....
@ #3:
No way. Doesn't make sense...or at least not without alien intervention or us injecting computers/machines into our heads, at which point we really would no longer be able to accurately refer to ourselves as simply "man" -- we would be one of them.
@ #3:
No way. Doesn't make sense...or at least not without alien intervention or us injecting computers/machines into our heads, at which point we really would no longer be able to accurately refer to ourselves as simply "man" -- we would be one of them.
I FEEL that we can overtake them again in future.
FEELings, nothing more than FEELings....
Offspring?
I was thinking Morris Albert, circa 1974.
You live and learn. Offspring version was a cover of the original Morris Albert song. In a distinctly different style!
Computers use an endgame tablebase that basically contains a pre-calculated exhaustive analysis of chess endgame positions.
The tablebase contains the game-theoretical value (win, loss, or draw) of each possible move in each possible position, and how many moves it would take to achieve that result with perfect play. Thus, the tablebase acts as an oracle, always providing the optimal moves. Typically the database records each possible position with certain pieces remaining on the board, and the best moves with White to move and with Black to move.
Based on mathematical calculations Stockfish 8 plays the correct move 96% of the time. Engines improve every year while the human mind has only improved a small amount since the 1970 era of chess, there is no chance of us overtaking them.
Its not about the correct move anymore, its about the better move augmented and sustained by the proceeding moves and also many a time it is impossible to claim a move or variation as best unless the engines deal with 7 pieces left on the board, with such imperfection and possibilities galore there still lies a glimmer of hope.
Is a strong human still able to beat an engine on correspondence time controls (i.e. several days to make a move) ?
Engine strength doesn't increase with time due to horizon effect.
5 piece endgames have been solved by computers ie/ they can not be beaten in an endgame.
As for the general idea of chess being effectively infinite and therefore there is a glimmer of a possibility of winning - that idea is also somewhat ridiculous. It is like asking "now that the car has overtaken the horse in terms of speed can the horse ever expect to beat a car again ?".
Put simply - no.