orangehonda

Sort:
GafuA-708

If you come back, I'm ready for blitz!

 

Haha!

GafuA-708

or bullet

ILuvPawn

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.

goldendog

It was not because of any complaints as far as i'm aware and we did not close it for him.  Orangehonda closed his own account- He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai

dave_9990

I think he actually posted that he "put fritz on while he was watching tv one time" on a thread about how to improve at chess ... and made a comment "it was funny".

Conflagration_Planet
ILuvPawn wrote:

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.


 What gives you that idea?

ILuvPawn
woodshover wrote:
ILuvPawn wrote:

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.


 What gives you that idea?


I remember someone posting that information on another thread about a month ago. Wasn't aware of kohai's comments as posted by goldendog above.

Conflagration_Planet
ILuvPawn wrote:
woodshover wrote:
ILuvPawn wrote:

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.


 What gives you that idea?


I remember someone posting that information on another thread about a month ago. Wasn't aware of kohai's comments as posted by goldendog above.


 There wouldn't be any reason for him to be banned. If he had been banned for cheating like another poster implied, It would have stated that, and it didn't.

dave_9990

hmm, maybe he told a joke about chesscube, then banned himself and mailed the mods about it,

polydiatonic
goldendog wrote:

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai


What does that mean???

Azukikuru

It means that he's working for [REMOVED BY THE CIA] and that he had to close his account because he had to [REMOVED BY THE CIA].

polydiatonic
Azukikuru wrote:

It means that he's working for [REMOVED BY THE CIA] and that he had to close his account because he had to [REMOVED BY THE CIA].


According to post #4, if I'm reading it correctly, he orange closed his own account.  He therefore would have been at liberty to say whatever he wanted.  I also assume he's at liberty to rejoin if he hasn't been banned.

ILuvPawn
polydiatonic wrote:
goldendog wrote:

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai


What does that mean???


It means that Orangehonda has been abducted by the chess.com staff and is currently hogtied in a basement at chess.com HQ. The reason for his abduction was because he actually showed up everyone else on this forum, including chess.com staff, with his numerous useful contributions.

bjazz

His two pennies were worth millions.

Conflagration_Planet
polydiatonic wrote:
goldendog wrote:

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai


What does that mean???


 He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.

artfizz
goldendog wrote:

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai


polydiatonic wrote: What does that mean???


woodshover wrote: He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.


or ...

"He is at liberty NOT to give a reason for him closing his own account." 

Conflagration_Planet
artfizz wrote:
goldendog wrote:

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai


polydiatonic wrote: What does that mean???


woodshover wrote: He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.


or ...

"He is at liberty NOT to give a reason for him closing his own account." 


 They obviously couldn't force somebody to give a reason for closing their account.

artfizz
goldendog wrote:

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.

--kohai


polydiatonic wrote: What does that mean???


woodshover wrote: He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.


artfizz wrote: or ...

"He is at liberty NOT to give a reason for him closing his own account." 


woodshover wrote: They obviously couldn't force somebody to give a reason for closing their account.


but 'they' can apparently force someone NOT to give a reason for closing their account.

batgirl

I think he just ran out of gas.

Conflagration_Planet

How? If they weren't banned, what's to stop somebody from coming on here, and saying "I'm closing my account because of this or that, then just closing their account?