or bullet
orangehonda

It was not because of any complaints as far as i'm aware and we did not close it for him. Orangehonda closed his own account- He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai

I think he actually posted that he "put fritz on while he was watching tv one time" on a thread about how to improve at chess ... and made a comment "it was funny".

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.
What gives you that idea?

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.
What gives you that idea?
I remember someone posting that information on another thread about a month ago. Wasn't aware of kohai's comments as posted by goldendog above.

Don't hold your breath. His account was deleted by chess.com.
What gives you that idea?
I remember someone posting that information on another thread about a month ago. Wasn't aware of kohai's comments as posted by goldendog above.
There wouldn't be any reason for him to be banned. If he had been banned for cheating like another poster implied, It would have stated that, and it didn't.

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai
What does that mean???

It means that he's working for [REMOVED BY THE CIA] and that he had to close his account because he had to [REMOVED BY THE CIA].

It means that he's working for [REMOVED BY THE CIA] and that he had to close his account because he had to [REMOVED BY THE CIA].
According to post #4, if I'm reading it correctly, he orange closed his own account. He therefore would have been at liberty to say whatever he wanted. I also assume he's at liberty to rejoin if he hasn't been banned.

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai
What does that mean???
It means that Orangehonda has been abducted by the chess.com staff and is currently hogtied in a basement at chess.com HQ. The reason for his abduction was because he actually showed up everyone else on this forum, including chess.com staff, with his numerous useful contributions.

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai
What does that mean???
He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai
polydiatonic wrote: What does that mean???
woodshover wrote: He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.
or ...
"He is at liberty NOT to give a reason for him closing his own account."

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai
polydiatonic wrote: What does that mean???
woodshover wrote: He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.
or ...
"He is at liberty NOT to give a reason for him closing his own account."
They obviously couldn't force somebody to give a reason for closing their account.

.... He is not at liberty to give a reason for closing his own account.
--kohai
polydiatonic wrote: What does that mean???
woodshover wrote: He would have had to have meant "WE are not at liberty to give a reason for him closing his account." We meaning Chess.com, not Orange.
artfizz wrote: or ...
"He is at liberty NOT to give a reason for him closing his own account."
woodshover wrote: They obviously couldn't force somebody to give a reason for closing their account.
but 'they' can apparently force someone NOT to give a reason for closing their account.
If you come back, I'm ready for blitz!
Haha!