people who have odd playing histories!

Sort:
TheYear9876
mephistoWaltzz wrote:

doesn't chess.com have algorithms that can pick out computer play. Playchess.com uses this and I see reports of players cheating every 5 secs posted in the chat there. If chess.com doesnt' have said algorithms then I think its time they research this and consider using it.


they do.

Frankdawg
fleaFlicKer101 wrote:

it is very strange that this ****** fella very rarely loses and when he does it seems thrown, why do people use computer aided help to cheat there profile up! so if any 1 reads this i suggest staying away from ******** he is not a legit player and u will find that a guy who rarely loses but in the beginning of his profile played like his lvl,  but now plays like a 1800 lvl and no Never loses well i have to call this guy out cause i hate cheaters....and if it comes to this "cheating" why don't we all have a computer programing running in back ground so we all can have near perfect records...to all the peeps out there that use computer aid GET GOOD LOSERS!!


 

I have take a look at your post, and have come to the conclusion that you are just being a sore loser or being an idiot.

First of all when you suspect a cheater, contact staff, and not the forums if you plan on naming a name. This thread will likely be deleted, or edited because of that.

Second of all the guy you suspect of being a cheater has at best beaten a person rated 1401. He only wins 52% of his games. Generally when people are a cheater they don't spend that time messing around with weaker players, and they tend to win more games than 52% of them. Before I would even begin to suspect a person of possibly cheating they would need to win at least 75% of there games. They would need to be rated at least 2000 or close to that. If that guy is only winning 52% of his games and is that low rated his method of "cheating" is not helping him climb that rating ladder very high so why complane?

When you find a guy who with a 95-100% win rate, and he is not a titled player, and he is rated like  2400 in correspondence, and then you see something fishy like he is only rated 1100 in bullet and 1300 in blitz having played over many games in each... Ya you might have found a cheater, until then don't quit your day job.

Krone
uffruffEccekio wrote:

Hey. I'm 1400 in CC but about 300 lower at 10 min chess. I find if I play slow enough to win I time out, and if I play fast enough to not time out, I make so many blunders I lose. Guess I am just hopeless at 10 min chess. if you accuse me of cheating at CC I shall punch you in the nose.:)


"if you accuse me of cheating at CC I shall punch you in the nose.:)" lol/lol/lol

kohai

Please refer to this page

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/chesscom-policy-on-cheating

We provide tools to report cheating to our staff. But having several constant and redundant threads on the topic that circulate with the same questions and comments over and over again isn't helpful, and instead causes people to worry more than they need to. If you want to discuss cheating, please do it in this group

http://www.chess.com/groups/home/cheating-forum

This forum topic has been locked