Cc removes better
Premove implementations
Sort:
*premoves
Actually if I'm using my laptop I'd prefer the other type of premove but when using phone or ipad I'd choose chess.com lol
CC is better
Jan 8, 2021
0
#9
I much prefer chess.com's premoves. But I think it's more of a personal preference, Andrew Tang prefers the other one obviously, Naka prefers chess.com, Firouzja plays on a different site I think on his streams, when playing casually (i.e. not in any chess.com tournaments) and all are incredible bullet players, so I guess either works.
Jan 8, 2021
0
#11
I prefer chess.com premoves as I think it's pretty unfair to spend 0 seconds on any move lol, that kind of defeats the purpose. Chess.com's 0.1 premoves are more fair.
If I had like 0.3 seconds against 3 minutes but an easy premoved mate that takes 4 moves, I would be pretty pissed after chess.com declares a loss while the other way would declare a win.
Jan 8, 2021
0
#13
Chessguy149 wrote:
If I had like 0.3 seconds against 3 minutes but an easy premoved mate that takes 4 moves, I would be pretty pissed after chess.com declares a loss while the other way would declare a win.
You wouldn't be able to do it the second way either though since you can't chain premove, so you could premove one move ahead in the mate, but if your opponent is also premoving you're going to lose anyway. Chess.com premoves are more fair, and are more practical with allowing premoving several moves ahead for sequences like forced mates and such.
Jan 8, 2021
0
#14
Kuyadige2 wrote:
Chessguy149 wrote:
If I had like 0.3 seconds against 3 minutes but an easy premoved mate that takes 4 moves, I would be pretty pissed after chess.com declares a loss while the other way would declare a win.
You wouldn't be able to do it the second way either though since you can't chain premove, so you could premove one move ahead in the mate, but if your opponent is also premoving you're going to lose anyway. Chess.com premoves are more fair, and are more practical with allowing premoving several moves ahead for sequences like forced mates and such.
Watch @penguingm1 on YT and think again....
Jan 8, 2021
0
#15
It's not physically possible to play a move in 0 seconds (online or OTB)
0.1 seconds is near the realm of possibility in OTB (if you move the piece right next to the clock)
0.1 is definitely possible online.
I prefer 0.1 seconds.
Jan 8, 2021
0
#16
SpeedyCyclone wrote:
Kuyadige2 wrote:
Chessguy149 wrote:
If I had like 0.3 seconds against 3 minutes but an easy premoved mate that takes 4 moves, I would be pretty pissed after chess.com declares a loss while the other way would declare a win.
You wouldn't be able to do it the second way either though since you can't chain premove, so you could premove one move ahead in the mate, but if your opponent is also premoving you're going to lose anyway. Chess.com premoves are more fair, and are more practical with allowing premoving several moves ahead for sequences like forced mates and such.
Watch @penguingm1 on YT and think again....
I was speaking about @chessguy149, not humans in general. Technically possible, yes. But for mortals like me or you, not possible at all.
Jan 8, 2021
0
#17
SpeedyCyclone wrote:
Kuyadige2 wrote:
Chessguy149 wrote:
If I had like 0.3 seconds against 3 minutes but an easy premoved mate that takes 4 moves, I would be pretty pissed after chess.com declares a loss while the other way would declare a win.
You wouldn't be able to do it the second way either though since you can't chain premove, so you could premove one move ahead in the mate, but if your opponent is also premoving you're going to lose anyway. Chess.com premoves are more fair, and are more practical with allowing premoving several moves ahead for sequences like forced mates and such.
Watch @penguingm1 on YT and think again....
except chessguy isnt Andrew Tang -_-
Jan 8, 2021
0
#18
Typewriter44 wrote:
It's not physically possible to play a move in 0 seconds (online or OTB)
0.1 seconds is near the realm of possibility in OTB (if you move the piece right next to the clock)
0.1 is definitely possible online.
I prefer 0.1 seconds.
it is if you make it before hand hence the name pre-move
Jan 8, 2021
0
#19
SpeedyCyclone wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
It's not physically possible to play a move in 0 seconds (online or OTB)
0.1 seconds is near the realm of possibility in OTB (if you move the piece right next to the clock)
0.1 is definitely possible online.
I prefer 0.1 seconds.
it is if you make it before hand hence the name pre-move
but it isn't called pre "0 second" move
Jan 8, 2021
0
#20
SpeedyCyclone wrote:
Typewriter44 wrote:
It's not physically possible to play a move in 0 seconds (online or OTB)
0.1 seconds is near the realm of possibility in OTB (if you move the piece right next to the clock)
0.1 is definitely possible online.
I prefer 0.1 seconds.
it is if you make it before hand hence the name pre-move
You're not making the move in 0 seconds if you make the move before your opponent moves.
Premoves are not a thing OTB. It's not physically possible to move the piece in 0 seconds.
Bullet experts help me out. What do you prefer? When it is your opponents turn you can do 8 premoves max each costing 0.1s or you can only do 1 premove per turn costing 0.0s.
they each have their pro's and con's.