if you can force it into a draw when they are in a losing position than they out played you and kept the game alive
Quitting chess if people don't show sportsmanship when defeated

Maybe I didn't understand correctly, but your outburst seems strange to me.
Clock is part of the game, if you play with the clock. In these cases you have to checkmate your opponent within the set time, otherwise you haven't beaten him...! It must be taken into account, the clock is not an embellishment.

The people who do this probably won't even read this or even visit the forums because I get the feeling they are the worst, most antisocial people out there.
What I am referring to is forcing a draw by inadequate material when they are down to a lone king and you have beat them fair and square after a long slog but your clock is running down.
Just resign. It's not the grandmasters and you will only lose a couple of points off your rating so what is with people being so unsportsmanlike?
I guess I feel offended by this behaviour because I resign, even though I don't wish to, when I am beat. Just move on to another game and don't be such a baby.
I always imagined chess to be a sport above that sort of behaviour but seems it is turning into the same thing you would expect to see on some shoot 'em up game.
You know who you are, hang your head in shame if the hat fits.
Quit chess

Some players are fighters and will never throw in the towel, no matter what kinds of odds are stacked against them.
Just because you're winning on the board, that doesn't mean they have to make it easy for you.
Also: the clock is part of the game, and if you mismanage your clock, expect your opponent to punish you for it ...

Why didn't Bagpipe resign his 54 move game when he was a Rook down and even more for the last 25 moves? Most shocking case of bad sportsmanship I've ever seen!

I have never seen so many people miss the point at one time.
My point is not that you should just resign when you have pieces left. My point is that if you have had a good game and you lose the end game to your opponent and are left with your king on its own and they have a bit less time than you, don't just hop scotch around knowing that you are going to draw on time. It's really poor sportsmanship. Just concede and move on.
Going through my games to find examples of this is futile as I resign if I am beat. The only time I won't is when it is clear I will be checkmated soon anyway, like AussieMatey so kindly describes, in this case it is nice to let your opponent have the win by checkmate.
The general tone of the replies here describe the issue with some of the player base quite clearly.
"I am going to dig my heels in and stamp my feet because you beat me fair and square and I am actually angry that I was beat in the first place and due to my feelings of inadequacy I can't let you have the win" yet you call me the cry baby?
The cry babies are you lot that can't just be the bigger person and concede.
That sort of play is for tournaments when it actually matters. Stop dreaming like you are some sort of brilliant chess player, the fact you come here to talk down to people tells us all we need to know about your abilities both at chess and elsewhere in life.

good to see mature discussion is also a feature of the community. what a circus. tickets must be dirt cheap

You´ve only defeated anyone fair and square once you´ve mated him or his time has run out. That´s the rules of the game. Whining about opponents who keep fighting to the bitter end is unsportsmanlike.

Playing on in a lost position isn't stalling.
Stalling is intentionally refusing to move.

Forcing a draw and resigning are both fine.
Whats not fine is abandoning games and wasting 5 minutes of the other persons time.

The gist of what you are saying is "if I am nice to everyone, everyone else should be nice to me too" which is a justifiable thing to ask, but you just simply can't hold expectations from people. The only thing that is set in stone are the rules of chess and this site, everything that a player resorts to falls under completely fair play as long he is adhering to the guidelines established.

I have never seen so many people miss the point at one time.
My point is not that you should just resign when you have pieces left. My point is that if you have had a good game and you lose the end game to your opponent and are left with your king on its own and they have a bit less time than you, don't just hop scotch around knowing that you are going to draw on time. It's really poor sportsmanship. Just concede and move on.
Going through my games to find examples of this is futile as I resign if I am beat. The only time I won't is when it is clear I will be checkmated soon anyway, like AussieMatey so kindly describes, in this case it is nice to let your opponent have the win by checkmate.
The general tone of the replies here describe the issue with some of the player base quite clearly.
"I am going to dig my heels in and stamp my feet because you beat me fair and square and I am actually angry that I was beat in the first place and due to my feelings of inadequacy I can't let you have the win" yet you call me the cry baby?
The cry babies are you lot that can't just be the bigger person and concede.
That sort of play is for tournaments when it actually matters. Stop dreaming like you are some sort of brilliant chess player, the fact you come here to talk down to people tells us all we need to know about your abilities both at chess and elsewhere in life.
if you can force a draw no matter if you only have a king that just means your good at chess not you have bad sportsmanship
The people who do this probably won't even read this or even visit the forums because I get the feeling they are the worst, most antisocial people out there.
What I am referring to is forcing a draw by inadequate material when they are down to a lone king and you have beat them fair and square after a long slog but your clock is running down.
Just resign. It's not the grandmasters and you will only lose a couple of points off your rating so what is with people being so unsportsmanlike?
I guess I feel offended by this behaviour because I resign, even though I don't wish to, when I am beat. Just move on to another game and don't be such a baby.
I always imagined chess to be a sport above that sort of behaviour but seems it is turning into the same thing you would expect to see on some shoot 'em up game.
You know who you are, hang your head in shame if the hat fits.