14295 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Can someone please explain to me how Ratings and Points work? eg: I lose a game and I lose about 40 or more numbers in my Rating. And then I win a game in 13 moves and my Rating only increases by 4 (four) ???
Chess.com uses the Glicko rating system whose mathematics are well beyond my ability to comprehend but that won't stop me from trying to explain it. Basically your rating is determined not only by the relationship between your rating and that of your opponent but also by the number of games each of you have played. The intent is to quickly find your appropriate rating range. In the beginning your rating will bounce up and down like a kid on a trampoline. Later it's more like an old man napping in a hammock. Your rating deviation (RD) is very high when you first start and then gradually lowers until after about 100 games it stabilizes. For many much more profound discussions please check out the archived forums I've given you a link to. Googling Glicko wouldn't hurt either.
EDIT: Oh and points are just a nonsense # that keeps track of how active you are in the forums and how chatty you are in tournaments. If you have a big mouth (like me) you get a lot of them.
Thank you Baddogno Will check out your link provided.
I add my 2 cents to address your statement "And then I win a game in 13 moves"
Neither Glicko nor ELO ratings (the ones used by FIDE) take into account how you win or loose.
There's no such measure.
Letting down the slight differences between ELO, Glicko and Glicko-2, the main factors that count are the rating of the players and the result of the game (win, loss or draw).
So, if you lose to Carlsen falling into some disguised version of fool's mate, or you last 85 moves and then lose just by 1 pawn deep in the ending, that makes no difference to ratings.
Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess....a review
by jambyvedar 5 minutes ago
Anyone else disgusted by fat chess players?
by Estren 6 minutes ago
10/26/2016 - What's Better Than Winning A Queen?
by ZoomZoom52 11 minutes ago
Is this chess or free advertising?
by kingofshedinjas 18 minutes ago
Report SPAM here (Not cheating, Not abuse, ONLY spam)
by kingofshedinjas 19 minutes ago
by kaynight 20 minutes ago
Does Karjakin even have a "puncher's chance"?
by madhacker 29 minutes ago
by Chess_Impress 29 minutes ago
Ceramic chess set
by verylate 33 minutes ago
Any good books/instruction on the French Exchange?
by nescitus 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!