Sending High Rated Women Back to Their Appropriate Rating Levels

I just played a very high rated woman from Indonesia.  I normally do not play women because they are not very good at chess and rarely get past the 1200 mark.  This particular woman was rated very high so I congratulated her for getting her rating as a women because I know it is a tremendous disadvantage.  Unfortunately she did not respond to me when I said this and did not thank me for my compliment when I called her beautiful.  Because of this I had to send her back to a more appropriate rating level by beating her mercilously.  I think it is best to keep woman off of the chessboard as they are not as good as men and distract you when you are playing with their beauty.  What do you guys think of this new idea that women too can play chess?  I think it is inappropriate.  Here is the game where I stomped on her.  : 

Do you always brag about beating lower rated players, or only when you beat women who are lower rated players?

He's just winding you up 0110001101101000 don't bite! Either that or the guy has genuine problems relating to and understanding women. Maybe he's one of these that never got any attention when he was a kid? 

Just messing with him in return

I dont understand?  How does this have to do with women and chess? WHo is winding you up??

I don't know about the real women players here, but I encountered one particularly nasty one who after losing to me, kept calling me an engine user, and seems to have some kind of mental problem.

I looked at "her" profile later, and saw that "she" only befriended titled players or very strong amateurs (who might be titled players all the same). How amusing.

She/he/it behaved just as bad as many men do around here. Just sayin.

Ha! What a jerk! One of the few times I wish I was really good at chess

I agree. The OP is definitely a jerk.

Even then it's not necessary. It takes surprisingly little knowledge of chess theory to strike someone over the head with the board.

Looking at the game, the OP plays like a transvestite.

Y a board? A knight in the eye is sly. A rook on the seat is neat - sort of like a back rank mate. I could go on but I have this cute image to maintain ...

internattynube wrote:

"I normally do not play women because they are not very good at chess and rarely get past the 1200 mark."

wow 

What about the Polgar sisters. They would beat you in a blink of an eye.

Don't feed the troll !  

If you flip the board right, you can send it at your opponent along with several pieces!

Also, violence and cuteness go hand-in-hand, I think. Or I'm wrong and this explains a lot about my life.

Wow but parallel processing has always baffled me. 1 piece at a time for me.

That method does let you savor the experience. 33 little strikes instead of one big one.

Just try to educate your mind; you surely gonna lose to a woman. nobody wanted to lose to a woman but man still ended up on a loser side.

I am not trying to insult anyone.  It is no secret that women are less good at chess than men.  Just look at some of the womens masters on here.  I saw a WCM who was 1400 yesterday.  ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? Come on 1800 for a women is very impressive.  If anything i am complimenting her and she doesnt show me any respect and ignores me when i call her beautiful???? what a joke.  I might get a sex change just so i can be the greatest women player on earth.  Women do not belong on the 64 squares and i think it is innapropraite for them to play with men who are undoubtedly stronger.