something not right

Sort:
wtf_BobbyF

its not the foot fetish per se, its the fact of older people flirting with 13 year old kids!

red-lady

A man of his age should leave a girl who says she is 13 alone. No excuses for that. She blocked me for warning her... It's her age I think. Wink

Swfc75

it's all a bit sick . that nagu bloke is a proper wrong un . this site is for chess not foot fetish stuff . 

waffllemaster
wtf_BobbyF wrote:

omg check his friends list

Wow, you're right.

I guess it's not in violation of TOS but... hmm Undecided

ponz111

Just saw your post but sorry I have reasons not to play matches here.

Charlotte
waffllemaster wrote:
wtf_BobbyF wrote:

omg check his friends list

Wow, you're right.

I guess it's not in violation of TOS but... hmm

who are you? judge and Jury?

zborg

Here's a good story.  Quick too.

My curvaceous (former) girlfriend was a "minor celebrity" as personal trainer to many well-heeled, millionaire Land Developers in town.  She hired a publicist, who eventually got (barefoot) photos of her (in her custom built gym), published in a well known city magazine.

Two or three guys with foot fetishes immediately starting call her, asking for personal "cardio classes," along with wanting to discuss the curves in her feet.    

She eventually fired the publicist, as no new business actually resulted.  Laughing    

waffllemaster
Charlotte_212 wrote:
waffllemaster wrote:
wtf_BobbyF wrote:

omg check his friends list

Wow, you're right.

I guess it's not in violation of TOS but... hmm

who are you? judge and Jury?

This comment is usually made when someone condemns another while assuming the role of an absolute authority.  My comment is given as a mere personal reaction, and not a condemning one either.  In fact I point out that it's not in violation of the site's rules. 

Maybe you can clarify your disagreement.  Use of hyperbole leaves a lot open to interpretation, especially when it's the only statement in your post.

Conflagration_Planet
Charlotte_212 wrote:
waffllemaster wrote:
wtf_BobbyF wrote:

omg check his friends list

Wow, you're right.

I guess it's not in violation of TOS but... hmm

who are you? judge and Jury?

You forgot the executioner part.

zborg

@Charlotte_212 used to have racy photos, with references to "Chili Sauce" in her profile, @Waffle.  You might want to check if they are still there.  Laughing

zborg

Something's Not Right With This Thread.  Clearly.

waffllemaster
zborg wrote:

@Charlotte_212 used to have racy photos, with references to "Chili Sauce" in her profile, @Waffle.  You might want to check if they are still there.  


Seems only friends can view her photos.  Oh well.  If she disagrees with me disapproving of a 30 yr old and a 13 yr old, I may be too young for her.  By my calculations my chances would be better if I were ~62 Tongue out

Polar_Bear

Zoediaz was banned for cheating cca week ago.

http://www.chess.com/home/game_archive?member=ZoeDiaz&show=live

Swfc75

loads on here seem to cheat , dont see the point myself . play to improve 

Polar_Bear
Swfc75 wrote:

loads on here seem to cheat , dont see the point myself . play to improve 

I have adopted opposite approach. I play in OTB club's team league, here I play serious correspondence chess. I consider myself noble human correspondence player way above the whole ICCF's computerized rabble.

Swfc75

i find it difficult to play otb chess , not many people i know play . this is a great site to play with good players but you have to be selective . i don't mind losing to a better player as i can learn but there does seem to be alot of obvious accounts that don't last too long on here .