Strategic Position

Sort:
Avatar of Simplemind12
BorgQueen wrote:

I'd say he is!

You should be an expert at this now Kurogkug!

I think I am an expert now Borg.  Only because I think I know now what is the meaning of ''strategic position'' and not how to strategically position my pieces.  And that is  ''a position based on strategy''.

Can you double check if this is correct?.

In the movie I.D.

Strategy of the aliens = to kill all the leaders of earth.

Strategic position = the aliens strategically position their crafts, over targets (all the leaders of earth), so that it will based on their strategy (to kill all the leaders of earth).

In chess Board

Strategy = to win those black pawns or otherwise convert the position to a clear and easy way.

Strategic position = The knight on d4, blocking the black d pawn from advancing and attacking c6.  Therefore, the knight on d4 is in strategic position and the knight position on d4 is based on strategy ( to win those black pawns or otherwise convert the position to a clear and easy way).

So, I'm I right or wrong Borg.  I' ll wait again to Borg.

Avatar of Simplemind12
Dafonzzz wrote:

A really good book that explains strategy in plain, simple language is by Jeremy Silman & is called Reassess Your Chess. Go through it twice, back to back, so it sinks in good. Follow this up with The Amatuers Mind, by him also. Again, back to back. I understand he wrote an endgame book also, I'm sure it's of good quality. There's also The Art of The Middlegame by Kotov. But there's a LOT of good books on piece deployment. Study pawn structures, it will guide you in figuring out where the pieces will be best placed depending on the structure. Plus, this very site has a tremendous amount of instruction videos & articles. There's also Chess Mentor on here. I'm going to join it as a paying member soon but even the free version I'm using now can be instructional if you use it. Just browse around for a while, there are good learning tools right here

 

Thanks Dafonzzz, but I have no money to buy a books.

Avatar of Simplemind12
jtt96 wrote:
Dafonzzz wrote:

A really good book that explains strategy in plain, simple language is by Jeremy Silman & is called Reassess Your Chess. Go through it twice, back to back, so it sinks in good. Follow this up with The Amatuers Mind, by him also. Again, back to back. I understand he wrote an endgame book also, I'm sure it's of good quality. There's also The Art of The Middlegame by Kotov. But there's a LOT of good books on piece deployment. Study pawn structures, it will guide you in figuring out where the pieces will be best placed depending on the structure. Plus, this very site has a tremendous amount of instruction videos & articles. There's also Chess Mentor on here. I'm going to join it as a paying member soon but even the free version I'm using now can be instructional if you use it. Just browse around for a while,there's good learning tools right here

The only Silman book I have read is the endgame one, but based on how much I learned from it, I am tempted to buy some of his other books. (like 'reasses' your chess)

Is that words ''based on'' you used in bottom of your sentence is the same meaning as the words ''based on'' in words ''a position based on strategy''?.  I just curious jtt96, I been trying to know what is the meaning of it.

Avatar of Simplemind12
schacci wrote:

come on anybody, help the poor guy out, if you know...

Thanks schacci.

Avatar of Simplemind12
StrategicPlay wrote:

"Have I been summoned?"

Is your name is the same as the meaning of ''strategic positioning in chess'', StrategicPlay?.

Avatar of Simplemind12
DrSpudnik wrote:

You've been subpoenaed!

Lol.

Avatar of Simplemind12
hankas wrote:

Responding to the OP, first determine the plan and then coordinate your pieces. When your pieces are well coordinated toward a specific plan, they are said to be strategically positioned. Look at Capablanca's games if you want to see how the great masters mobilize their forces. Capa's clear style makes his games very instructive. Of course, the next question is "how do you formulate a good plan?", in which there is no clear answer.

So, the meaning of ''strategic positioning of pieces'' is well coordinated towards my specific plan, right?.  So, you mean it is the same as BQ's meaning of ''strategic positioning'' which ''put your pieces in effective positions~~ make sure they are not suppressed or dormant or worse, out of play or improving your pieces''?.

Avatar of Simplemind12
schacci wrote:
Simplemind12 wrote:
sapientdust wrote:

This has been "answered" here and here. Unfortunately, Kurogkug has closed his account and seems to have deleted all his comments in the infamous "if you know" thread.

You aren't Kurogkug come back under a different account, are you?

I' am.

yay!!!!!

Lol.

Avatar of Simplemind12
BorgQueen wrote:

It should be noted that the OP has been asking this question for about 3 years.  I tried for two years to explain it to him, but it seems nothing will work!

There once was a topic called "if you know" that I really wish could be linked here so that people could understand what I am saying here!!  

It's sometimes so very wrong to remove topics that a member has made if they close their account!

Your right Borg, they should not remove it, even though I closed my account.

Avatar of Simplemind12
AnthonyCG wrote:

The saga continues...

Yes indeed.

Avatar of AlCzervik

Strategy? I just use the Parham

Avatar of Simplemind12
BorgQueen wrote:
Estragon wrote:
Yes, we have moved on to new foolishness and absurdity now, like weak players demanding rules be changed because they aren't smart enough to understand them.

Like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like like!  lol

Hi Borg, you didn't answer my question yet in my post # 27?. don't worry I promise you, after you answer it, I will cancel my account here.  It seems to me that you already fed up with all of my false promises.

Avatar of Simplemind12
TMIMITW wrote:

Strategy? I just use the Parham

What Parham?.

Avatar of Simplemind12
BorgQueen wrote:

What do you expect Kuggie!?

If after 3 years you are STILL asking about "strategic position", despite me trying my best to explain it to you, then what really is the point in answering any more of your questions??

TBH, I now find it quite insulting.  By asking the question, you are effectively saying "nope, 2 years of your explaining to me is not enough or wasn't good enough, so I'll keep asking.".

Answer #27 yourself for crying out loud.

I'm Just trying to say Borg is just answer my question if it's is correct or not, and you will find out that this is my last question to you, but it seems to me that you don't believed to me anymore now.  It's easy Borg just answer it yes or no.

Avatar of AlCzervik
Simplemind12 wrote:

I think I am an expert now

You are on your way to stardom!

Avatar of ILBCNU
Simplemind12 wrote:
TMIMITW wrote:

Strategy? I just use the Parham

What Parham?.

I don't think the s-p of the Parham has been explained or explored adequately here yet.

Avatar of AlCzervik

OP should look into this.

Avatar of Simplemind12
schacci wrote:
Simplemind12 wrote:
TMIMITW wrote:

Strategy? I just use the Parham

What Parham?.

I don't think the s-p of the Parham has been explained or explored adequately here yet.

I think your right schacci.

Avatar of Simplemind12
BorgQueen wrote:

What do you expect Kuggie!?

If after 3 years you are STILL asking about "strategic position", despite me trying my best to explain it to you, then what really is the point in answering any more of your questions??

TBH, I now find it quite insulting.  By asking the question, you are effectively saying "nope, 2 years of your explaining to me is not enough or wasn't good enough, so I'll keep asking.".

Answer #27 yourself for crying out loud.

Oh, I forgot to tell you Borg, that the reason I asking you what is ''strategic position'' again is because all my questions before was incomplete.  But It's ok, I understand your grievances. I'm sorry for what I said before, and thanks a lot of your supports since day one.  Bye.

Avatar of AndyClifton
BorgQueen wrote:

2 years of questioning... is incomplete ??

So... what?... you're going for 5 years?

First the Berlin Wall falls, and now this...can such joy exist?! 

Avatar of Guest9522052704
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.