There is also a large body of evidence showing that inexperienced people learn a lot more from observing and listening to experienced people as opposed to asking the same meaningless questions not pertaining the subject at hand over and over again expecting different answers each time.
Freedom of speech ,like democracy, is utterly flawed as three wolves and one sheep voting on what they should have for dinner proves.
"theRoid1?"
oh dear that insult wasn't accurate. botching up the name just SO makes less clever then it could have been.
anyways 851. we've all been there.
no proof you or your rooster can play at that level. just sayin'.
it was just a typo man, you think too much.
we don't need restrictions because what's wrong with posting a forum about the thing we are all here for: chess!
100010000100000011100000101010001001000100100100000011111111111100000000000000000000000000101011110000000000000011111111000000000001111111110000000000001100000000000001111100000000101010101000001111000001000100101010101010101010101010101010100000000000001111000000101001000001000010001000100010000000000001010010001001000010001110000010011000010010000100000000001000000100000001000000101100000000000
You will never crack my message!
There is some not inconsiderable evidence as witnessed for example in the research posted in the book the wisdom of crowds that collectively large numbers of inexpert people often come to better and more accurate conclusions than individual experts. Equally there is the question of freedom of speech without which any community on or off line is unlikely to thrive.