I think she was trying to reverse the bodily effects of ageing.
*runs*
The one with the most profile views wins a game analyses
Sort:
I think we have a winner.
1random, you will be revealed in the evening. Watch out! :)
Scottrf wrote:
I think she was trying to reverse the bodily effects of ageing.
*runs*
Run for your life! 
y2721 wrote:
I think this is pointless, as the Chess.com bot http://www.chess.com/members/view/CHESScom obviously has more views than anyone else here. On the other hand, I only have 3246 views.
CHESScom has only 482301 views, so he loses to dailypuzzle with 731979 views.
http://www.chess.com/members/view/dailypuzzle
I just need 7 hours and I can give anyone 1,000,000 profile views.
That's correct. Let it be 7 of us and give NA 1M views? :)
MSC157 wrote:
That's correct. Let it be 7 of us and give NA 1M views? :)
In 1 hour? Personally I use an eraser and a shampoo and do something else in the meantime.
Oh yes, so the surface below is not so big? :)
MSC157 wrote:
Oh yes, so the surface below is not so big? :)
Below those two? It's quite small actually, it covers only one fifth of the eraser. But shampoo stands on the latter brilliantly.
Spending 7 hours pressing f5 sounds totally worth to get that game analysis. 
Who cares about profile views?
They do
May 28, 2014
0
#55
OrganicCloud wrote:
25 moves is a well developed opening.
ok you are right, I will bring it up to the full game although it is going to be much less quality. Alot of moves in there and also I have to make another one for the one with the most profile views of this.
Ok, sounds good. Diminished quality is fine, that's understandable. I'm just eager to see your thoughts, I believe by you doing it in a public way it will really help your chess strength. Also, a lot of the game I posted is an endgame. That's important. You should do all this analysis without a computer program.
By the way, that scholastic tournament you just finished playing, was it rated? It would be cool to see all those games annotated in detail by you when you get the time. I'll annotate one for you in return for this. We can all comment on the games. This is a good idea you had.
May 29, 2014
0
#57
MrDamonSmith wrote:
Ok, sounds good. Diminished quality is fine, that's understandable. I'm just eager to see your thoughts, I believe by you doing it in a public way it will really help your chess strength. Also, a lot of the game I posted is an endgame. That's important. You should do all this analysis without a computer program.
By the way, that scholastic tournament you just finished playing, was it rated? It would be cool to see all those games annotated in detail by you when you get the time. I'll annotate one for you in return for this. We can all comment on the games. This is a good idea you had.
Ok thank you for accepting the annalyses. The Canada chess championship ? Yes I am quite sure it was rated. This is probably my second rated tournament. And if they were anotaded. Personaly I did not record them. But I saw them be recorded by my oponents for practise. I am quite sure I can get the PGN online. And also if you want to know all about the tournament the destination and the people I met there and if you are interested in knowing who I played and how it went. ( Details about the opening ect. ) go here :
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/tournaments/nationals-in-manitoba-going-well
SebLeb i can't find your CFC records.....you surely have a CFC membership?
May 29, 2014
0
#59
CP6033 wrote:
SebLeb i can't find your CFC records.....you surely have a CFC membership?
No but I have a automaticly tracked rating. ( I must ask, does this rating start at 0 ? )
If I put a low cut top on and do a handstand up the wall, can someone take a photo please so I can flip it round and use as my avatar. Thanks.
If you did that & then turned the photo right side up again it would look like you had your hands up, your hair would be pointing straight up, & you'd look like you had too much blood to your head! That would definately get a lot of views.