Try playing against chess computers in that range and you will see that the tactical range of a computer and a master is very large. Computers calculate every single response before making a move. Grandmasters can only calculate up to a certain depth. Computers on the other hand can go much deeper.
Ex: Deep Blue was capable of calculating over 1 billion moves a sec.
This is not really correct. GMs can indeed calculate to a depth comparable to comps...the difference is that their approach is selective, rather than brute number-crunching.
This looks like a post from the 90's. At the moment, GMs cannot calculate to a depth comparable to comps... and the modern engines are a long way past brute number-crunching, their approach is highly selective as well.
if u whould give kasparov an anlimited time per move he can! the main difrence in obviosly the speed
HALO, ORI! I too don't understand the rating system. it does'nt seem to be exactly fair. if i win against a high rating, it does'nt seem like my rating get's much higher. i'm spinning my wheels on 1355. not to even mention lots of times i have been beatin by lower rated players, i only create team matches that all ratings can partake in. that only seems fair, so a rating of any standard can possibly up their rating.
your friend TOM;
Try playing against chess computers in that range and you will see that the tactical range of a computer and a master is very large. Computers calculate every single response before making a move. Grandmasters can only calculate up to a certain depth. Computers on the other hand can go much deeper.
Ex: Deep Blue was capable of calculating over 1 billion moves a sec.
This is not really correct. GMs can indeed calculate to a depth comparable to comps...the difference is that their approach is selective, rather than brute number-crunching.
This looks like a post from the 90's
. At the moment, GMs cannot calculate to a depth comparable to comps... and the modern engines are a long way past brute number-crunching, their approach is highly selective as well.