This is why I never resign unless I have to leave a game

That kinda proved the point. You can look at a position, think one thing, but the reality is entirely different.

Are you talking about Post #54?

I fixed it. The kings were right next to each other which was an illegal position. in any case.

OK.  Anyway, it's a draw.  Regardless of whose move it is, move the king to the corner.  King plus rook pawn vs king is a draw.

lmfaoooo

what a thoughtful and constructive post that gives the readers a deep insight to what you were thinking.

Here's an interesting position that occurred in one of my games.  I offered my opponent a draw, which he declined.  He then pushed the pawn and captured my bishop only to find he could not promote the pawn.

when they don't know the drawing lines

Once I played a 10 minute game where it was a dead drawn endgame - all we could do was shuffle our king back and forth. I offered a draw, he declined, and moved his king back to try and "time me out" (I had about 30 seconds).

I won.

Time is a consideration tbf.

Yes, which probably motivated my opponent, but it was fairly easy to premove king takes pawn and promote.

where can i order a 1600 as bad as yours?

You should be able to play against 1600s with your rating tbh.

@snudoo when there's only 30 seconds left anything can happen.

If there's only 30 seconds left in a winning K+P endgame where the opponent doesn't have pawns... Yeah it's time to resign lol

like when your parents yell at you to "stop staring at that screen" lol

The bigger they come, the harder they fall.

huh?

Those that insist the opponent resign.