Chess is technically a win for White, by advanced number theory. The first player has a strategy that will assure a win for that side.
Ok, I'll bite. What advanced number theory are you referring to?
ZFC
Chess players are generally fairly good at math and can work whether the poster is full of ...himself.
Please explain which axioms of set theory you think apply that prove your claim.
Every zero-sum game means that White has a winning strategy that will always win with best play. Since White starts with +.1 or so, that means that White can win.
Your argument fails at the very start.
Tic-tac-toe is a zero-sum game. And yet, there is a forced draw every time. The theorem you misquote states that every zero-sum game that isn't a draw must be winning for one side or the other.
Chess is technically a win for White, by advanced number theory. The first player has a strategy that will assure a win for that side.
Ok, I'll bite. What advanced number theory are you referring to?
ZFC
Chess players are generally fairly good at math and can work whether the poster is full of ...himself.
Please explain which axioms of set theory you think apply that prove your claim.
Every zero-sum game means that White has a winning strategy that will always win with best play. Since White starts with +.1 or so, that means that White can win.