truth
Sort:
This is the third thread you make about this. The first got locked and the second got deleted. Maybe it's time to drop this now.
You are on his side (Metris). the majority here agrees with me. I threatened nobody. Do you ???
Mandelshtam
I haven't threatened anyone I just think it's really silly to make 3 threads about a petty argument.
For what it's worth I also think that you were being more rude than Metris after the chat logs were posted.
For someone who is supposedly a professor, you whine like a spoilt 3 year old.
Stop this now. Show some maturity and move on FFS!
PS - Metris appears to be a 17 year old girl.
WHAT? I said my honest opinion to Metris AFTER he distracted me, AFTER he tried to judge the game (it was not yet over).
But it's as I said: the winner is more "convincing" to some average people (like you are). That's the sad truth in this society.
By the way, nobody deleted my posts.
I am right and you and Metris are wrong. You know it, I know it, so let's stop this discussion.
I now challenge you to a game.
Mandelshtam
The sad truth is that you are completely up your own a**e!
NED63 I was right there are some people on this server who are rotten.
Mandelshtam
The sad truth is that you're going to meet people that you find rude everywhere. It might be on the internet, in the supermarket or your neighbourhood. You just have to let it go. If someone in the line in the supermarket is rude to you, you don't go to the owner of the store and try to get the person banned from there. You just go home and make a cup of tea or squeeze a stress ball.
you have such a high rating, you would think you have the mentality to not let someone ruffle your feathers like that. who cares what some guy who you are never going to meet says about you, time to move on brother
Why do you challenge people who disagree with you to a game. Is it so you can beat them and prove your right? If you win, it makes you more intelligent than your opponent and therefore your opinions are more worthy than his or hers. If you win, you can gloat on a latter thread that your better at chess than this guy.
If you lose one of these unnecessary grudge matches, you will just get more and more frustrated.
I just realised that the challenge probably was aimed at me. If it was then I accept. Not really sure what a chess game is going to prove though.
I am thankful to Metris that he showed the content of our chat to the public. (I didn't know technically how to do it). The amazing thing is that he apparently does not even feel guilty. I did not expect this... he has no moral conscience to the subject. At least now everybody can see, how immature (mildly speaking!!!) he is. I have of course, no no further intention to play with such a rude person.
He omitted cleverly the terrible insult against me in his message after I had challenged him again: he said WORD BY WORD, that I am a "disturbed person who has quite a few social issues".
The sad thing is, that the winner in chess often impresses the public: look at such bad persons like Aljechin, Kasparov and Topalov. They seem to have credit for their actions , which other playeres, who lost against them and behaved correctly, do not have...
mandelshtam
P.S.: Anyway, my rating is higher than the one of Metris.
I