What could be more depressing as a chess player ?

Is shouting on the forum about your make-up depression is productive. ps - which I am pretty much sure you use it just because you heard it somewhere on the media. 

Yes it is as long as people are responding to it on point. And the forum could be atleast productive in healing my "Make up depression ". But your comments serve no purpose.

Well actually its not he who plays alone. When he plays a GM or any high rated player ...its usually on his stream. I watched his recent match too. Anish Giri , Vidith Gujrathi would be beside him as commentators....and a few others to suggest him something in critical situations. 

That make sense now,thanks!

There should be an * in front of his name in the game he was helped!

Don't attack me next time for no reason. 

When the hell did I attack you ? If you attack me first you would get a similar response.....and to not misinterpret what the other person says. You said something about the word gullu and I replied to it. There was no attack involved. 

Hmm..I didn't understand the second sentence .

What you meant by than that you will block me , my comments are irrelevant. So much attack yet at last you finally realized Sammia raina took outside assistant from chat. So  to say if you had not created this thread I wouldn't had to suffer

You unnecessarily mistook my words and felt  I was trying to "teach" you . Whatever be the reason for your misunderstanding , you could convey it in a civilized way. Once you trigger a person they are going to find your comments irrelevant. And unfortunately , I don't see how on earth are you connecting a dot between Samay Raina taking assistance and the nuisance that you have created here.

I was posting a comment to Ripley when you came out of nowhere and said you never heard that word between your school friend. You are basically throwing unfinished knowledge to me. Who wants to eat unripe Guava.After that it was all reaction from both sides with you acting like someone  with a higher authority. No mental illness person will be allowed to hold a higher position under his belt. That's a norm of society and rule of office. 

Point number one . This is a thread that I created and I take the liberty to respond to any comment thats posted here even if its not addressed directly to me . And thats how it is , you like or don't.

Point number two . I never heard of that word , and I stated that . Its not unfinished knowledge . 

Your very first failed attempt at trying to interpret what I meant in a proper way spoke a lot about the framework of your intelligence and communicating skills. Yet you got the audacity to keep coming back at me . Indeed no mentally ill person would hold a position under his belt. And I suppose that's the case with you. And speaking about higher authority , I certainly have that with respect to this thread . 

Lack of intelligence you call that retarded. It is you who created this thread undermining the rising case of mental illness in the world. I am not interested in the original post by you because I can defeat sammay raina anytime in slower time control. You don't need to bash off your comprehension skill as this represent only one type of intelligence. But I still think I understood how much I need to understand about your post. The rest are I don't know what I should do with them so I not interested.

Dont try to complicate things . I am not here to  justify the reason for which I created this thread. You better not be interested in the original post as I don't want anymore unwanted nuisance . I have tolerated enough of your retarted logic . Comprehensive skill being only one type of intelligence does not validate any of the points you previously made nor does it fabricate the fact that you came out at me in a barbarous way when it wasn't needed at all. 

How much a person throw attack after attack after one spark.You are the example.First you called me mentally ill and now you are calling me retarded. Next time you are going  to comment me pagal. 

Its not me just calling you names. You get called out names by what the actions that you do deserve to be called.

And its you who  called me mentally ill initially. So don't try to play the victim card. The only difference was that you provoked me by bringing up reference to mentally ill people without directly taking my name , while I chose to not take that cowardly path.

Not only have you shown to me the poor framework of your communication skills at the very beginning as I stated before , you were also stubborn enough to not accept your fault .Instead you tried to fabricate the argument as some sort of cat fight. You stated earlier that it was just a reaction from both sides. There is no reaction without an action . And the action was your misinterpretation of my comment and a terrible response to it. 

You said that you "know more than my and that I don't need to teach you " again says a lot about your character. 

The more you keep coming back , the more you are exposing the flaws in you.

stop press: beanstalk nested quoting is boring.

Hey, both of you, calm down.

You both have flaws in your logic and arguments, and some more than others. However, using Ad Hominem attacks is never going to win a debate. So, if any of you continue to have a problem, it's going through me.  I'm not letting irrational arguments reign supreme here. Logic will win.

Agreed . But I just want you to go through #89 , 90 , 91 and 92. And decide for yourself. 

When the person at your front tries to belittle you . You have got two options. One to smile and ignore . Second is to fight. Unfortunately I find it difficult to follow the first path.

I saw it. However, while ABC was mostly at fault, I'm trying to remain impartial. I fight too, but when the other person warps your words and doesn't give your perspective a try (still give their view a try), it's time to walk away. It's hard to do so, but it's the logical thing to do.