What is Consider a Good Chess Rating on this Site?

Sort:
AGC-Gambit_YT

it's subjective

AGC-Gambit_YT

LOL

spartakbarnsley
blueemu wrote:
dude0812 wrote:

So, wherever the dividing line is, the line above which players are good, the line has to be at least 2200. It may even be a couple of hundreds of points higher than that.

Yeah... I'm 2350 and I suck.

You very clearly don't suck at 2350

smiley_face10

Believe it or not the 50th percentile is like 600-700 elo but then again a lot of those people play chess like once a month. Here is my answer

below 500 - consider getting help...jk

below 1000 - beginner

1000-1200 - novice

1200-1500 - good

1500-1800 - advanced

1800-2300 - expert

2300-2500 - your probably titled by now(FM 2300-2400 IM 2400-2500 GM 2500+)

2500+ - u can actually make a living income off of chess!!!

MightyBorough

95% is excellent a class not d class

Arush_KK5

3000

Epologue

i personally believe that 500 makes a wonderful player

TaterBoy37
Above 1200 is good. That is when you have learned all the basics and are considered an intermediate player.
smiley_face10
Epologue wrote:

i personally believe that 500 makes a wonderful player

idk about that. maybe 1000 makes someone ok but 500 is beginner level.

Epologue

if i were to be honest i am impressed with anyone over 200

anything above that is GM level

smiley_face10

...bruh

NathanRubas

lol

Epologue

like have you ever seen someone over 300 lose to someone below 200?

like anyone over that 300 range is just superior

Deadmanparty

Good depends on your rating.

If someone is 400 points better than you, then that person is good

Lower rated than you, then bad.

smiley_face10
Epologue wrote:

like have you ever seen someone over 300 lose to someone below 200?

like anyone over that 300 range is just superior

is that supposed to be a joke or are you serious?

hkbusowkgpa4

I think that the players with rating less than 300 should quit chess.

This blog is disabled. Please contact Support if you have questions.