What is the mittens' real rating?

s 98,8 and mine was 98,6. This bot's elo is definitely 3700 or even more

It has beaten Stockfish with 2800 Elo, so she defenitly is a GM

It beat a 3200 Ultimate engine earlier

I'm 1600 myself and he totally annihilated me. 1 is a bit of an understatement I would say.

I put it against the 25 level cpu (3200) and it drew…

so, I think the elo of mittens is more than 3900 and I also drew her

Some of Mittens moves "impressed" me with some of it's positional ideas. If a human opponent played these in live chess, I'd suspect violation of fair play as the precision on some moves just feels "computer-ish." I see some of the reasons like a move or two after Mittens has already played it. I played Mittens 3 times and I was trying hard, but also more or less playing blitz. I give moves some thought, but won't spend more than a minute or so. I lost all 3 games where Mittens had over 90% accuracy in CAPS each time and the first game Mittens had 97% accuracy against me with 0 Innaccuracies, 0 Mistakes, 0 Blunders, 0 Misses and all I had were a few inaccuracies spread out over the game until my position collapsed. 

I was thinking more like 2300-2400 ish or perhaps more, but now coming to this forum thread, I see that this bot might be MUCH higher rated. 

p.s. The cat bots are hilarious though. Angry Cat is the cat from Woman Yelling At Cat meme and I love the cat puns. Catspuroff (idk exact spelling) is clearly Kasparov reference, but then also comments like "first Cat-purr, I mean capture" xD I like. 

Also "what do you call a rodent off balance? A mouseslip." lol chess.com bot humor is getting better xD

I'm finding it really hard to believe that a 900 rating player beat a 3200 engine with help on only 2 move, especially given that your opening was picture perfect and your most recent player game as black you lose the queen playing a terrible opening.

Haha just tried to beat mittens, probs rating of 3700

So Mittens is hard?

I am going to be in trouble.

The bot is probably rated over 3700 but you can still flag it

I put stockfish 15 against Mittens and Stockfish won very easily, so Mittens is probably around 3000.

Here is the game:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/29363341?tab=review

That’s very suspicious.

3050 is what I saw calculated 

Cracks me up that Mittens plays the Najdorf-Opecensky line, so there’s some indication there.

So I set up a board in Chessbase and made all the moves, inputting the variations Stockfish would show me in the game against Mittens. The advantage to doing this, rather than playing the engine as a standard match, is it allowed me to control the depth per single move rather than setting it to a fixed depth. 

Depth was between 30 and 40 most of the time, this is the game:

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/computer/29375201?tab=review

No trouble for Stockfish 15 beating this bot, it was already losing within 15 moves. Of course the processing time they allot for Mittens is practically nothing. Im running Stockfish 15 on a dedicated PC, 5950X processor (allocated all 32 cores to Stockfish), so it's understandable it'll be one-sided on my PC's favour.