What is the rough translation from online ratings to OTB ratings?

Sort:
sndeww

my cc is around 2200-2300 but im 1800 (laugh)

but I haven't lost rating points since july.

ricorat
B1ZMARK wrote:

my cc is around 2200-2300 but im 1800 (laugh)

but I haven't lost rating points since july.

Seeing you play at your last OTB you’re probably somewhere between 2000-2100

blueemu
B1ZMARK wrote:

If you’re an online sweat subtract 200. If you don’t play online much or only play online occasionally add 100-200 

I've only played a couple of games in the past two or three years.

So my real strength is around 2500... yes?

sndeww

 perhaps

ricorat
blueemu wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:

If you’re an online sweat subtract 200. If you don’t play online much or only play online occasionally add 100-200 

I've only played a couple of games in the past two or three years.

So my real strength is around 2500... yes?

GMblueemu

DreamscapeHorizons

A while back I checked that out (the correlation of ratings). I noticed that if u average ur daily rating, ur rapid, & ur blitz (only those 3), it wasn't far from the players stated uscf classic rating.

Edit: These have to be well established ratings though, not after 2 or 3 games or something rediculously low. 

sndeww

( 2299 + 2140 + 1270 ) / 3 == 1903

not that bad i guess

sndeww

rn im 1869 but i doubt my daily will go any higher. This also doesn't work with high end rapid since most people stop playing around 2100-2200 rapid.

llama47

Maybe a daily + blitz average or a rapid + blitz average would be interesting. Because daily and rapid tend to be massively inflated for noobs, while blitz is too low... and the reverse tends to be true for higher rated players. So they kind of cancel each other out.

But including both rapid and daily is probably bad.

Ubik42
Dreamscape in my case that is pretty accurate. 1 vote yes for that estimate.
DreamscapeHorizons

I bet everyones checking out each others others averages right now. 

sndeww

nah only mine since im too lazy to look at others'

llama47
DreamscapeHorizons wrote:

I bet everyones checking out each others others averages right now. 

Nah, I just assume it's a bad estimate tongue.png

blueemu
ricorat wrote:
blueemu wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:

If you’re an online sweat subtract 200. If you don’t play online much or only play online occasionally add 100-200 

I've only played a couple of games in the past two or three years.

So my real strength is around 2500... yes?

GMblueemu

That's SUPER-GM Blue Emu, thank you.

ricorat
blueemu wrote:
ricorat wrote:
blueemu wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:

If you’re an online sweat subtract 200. If you don’t play online much or only play online occasionally add 100-200 

I've only played a couple of games in the past two or three years.

So my real strength is around 2500... yes?

GMblueemu

 

That's SUPER-GM Blue Emu, thank you.

No worlds first 2900 GM Blue Emu

ricorat

Hmmm so I did the rating average thing (Although I put my daily at 1532 as it hovers around 1500 most of the time. It’s 1300 rn due to the fact that I resigned most games as I had to many) and mine would be 1690 which sounds pretty accurate tbh

drmrboss
B1ZMARK wrote:

( 2299 + 2140 + 1270 ) / 3 == 1903

not that bad i guess

My chess.com (bullet+ blitz+ rapid)= (2241+ 2111+ 2202)/3=2184

My lichess (bullet+ blitz)/2=( 2201+ 2232)/2=2216

Average online rating (chess.com + lichess)/2= 2184+2216= 2200

Conclusion= 2200 online, zero OTB or unrated.

Difference= 2200.😁😆

 

sndeww

Ah