what is worse - not resigning or demanding a resignation

Demanding a resignation (which, to be clear, has never happened to me) would make me want to extend a game as long as possible.  I'll resign when I think I've exhausted reasonable outs.  But sometimes I'll play on in long shots because people make mistakes, and also there are sometimes learning opportunities.  

I do think it's funny when people get aggressive in chat with taunts only to find themselves forked, losing a major piece, and on their way to getting mated.  I live for those moments.  

There's no reason to ever demand a resignation. Your opponent has every right to use all the time they've been given (just as you do).

If you're winning, simply checkmate your opponent. If you're unable to do that, it's your own fault.

If you're mad that your opponent is taking too long by playing on, then you shouldn't have chosen to play a long game, in the first place. That was your choice to play at that specific time control - not your opponent's.

  Sure.

But did this ever happened in a daily game between >1800s?

I don't care you don't have the right to cry just because your opponent is playing

Anyway with millions of chess game the answer is yes if there are 2000s blundering pieces in daily then of course stalemating too

I don't cry. I just don't get it.

MIT SCHMAGGES IN DEN MADDES!!! :blunder

Yeah it’s mean 

I mean in my opinion I think demanding a resignation is worse because you are just being mean to them asking them to resign which is mean in general and I mean not resigning is ok and is normal

It's worse to demand resignation.
If you ask me once and I'm clearly lost I could consider it.

But earlier this year I had a person constantly spamming "just resign" and that's just rude.

Tough I think he got into his own head as he lost the game while I was 5 points down and my entire queen flank obliterated!

I think it's very likely that this game will be a draw:

Agreed