I remember someone tried to get the TD to make a draw against me his win because I hadn't annotated the last 10 moves of the game. The TD was all 'nah man that aint cool' but if the guy had gotten that win against me I think I'd have been pretty mad, official rules or otherwise.
What OTB behavior REALLY annoys you?

I don't see why some people are getting so angry at Bawker. All of his pet peeves are totally reasonable, and it doesn't make sense to criticize them without giving any evidence. Calling people an "angry old prune" and dogmatically accusing them of contradicting themselves won't help you or him at all. To prove that Bawker's list is satisfactory I will analyze all of the not unlike one would analyze a chess game.
"Using 2 hands to castle (Gawd... I want to smack people who do this retarded $h!7)"
According Both FIDE and USCF rules, you may only use one hand to castle. I don't think anyone should get annoyed at Bawker for being slightly agitated at a rule breaker.
"Moving the rook first when castling (actually, I'm Ok with this from newbies. You've been around? Nada!)"
FIDE rules forbids anyone from moving their rook first when castling. FIDE classifies castling as a king move, and therefore moving the rook first is breaking the rules. However, USCF again classifies castling as a king move, but they do say that it is fine to move the rook first when castling. But even that rule is borderline, so I think that this pet peeve is justified again
"Sliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiding bishops, rooks, queens across the board in contact with the board surface"
FIDE and USCF both forbid one from offering draws when the move belongs to the opponent. This is because it is considered disruptive because your opponent is most likely in deep concentration. If Bawker finds the sliding of the pieces annoying, then I think this pet peeve is justified.
"Slamming pieces into each other when capturing, often knocking captured piece into an adjacent square"
I once heard of a match between to amateur opponents (Both rated about 1600) OTB. One player was very nice and courteous, and the other was rude and obnoxious. In the match, the nice player had a winning position, and the rude one was angry, so he slammed pieces into each other, knocking them into nearby squares and sometimes of the board. When the nice player finally won, the rude player practically tried to break his hand instead of shaking it. I don't know if anyone here would enjoy this happening to them, so again I think this pet peeve is justified.
"Using the base of a piece to punch the clock button (I own a Chronos touch SPECIFICALLY to prevent this!)"
I might be slightly biased on this one, but I hate scratches, dents, bumps, or germs with a burning passion. I was brought up with a mother who was a complete germophobe, though, so I might be a little extreme. Making dents in other people's equipment is completely unacceptable. Especially if you have an expensive clock that has no scratches or dents. If you do want to make any dents, then I find this behavior fine, as long as you pay for my clock. Once again, this pet peeve is justified.
"Hitting the clock button vigorously hard and noisy, or repeatedly"
Not only does this make dents and scratches, it's insanely annoying. This is almost the same as the pet peeve before this one, and since that was justified, this is too.
"Babbling about BS while I'm trying to analyze"
If you don't think this is annoying then I don't know what to tell you. Talking during a chess game is prohibited, and I see no reason why it should be allowed during an analysis. This pet peeve is not only justified, but anyone who questions it should be taken to a therapist.
"Telling me my queen is under attack... or pointing out an obvious fork or pin"
Why would anyone even want to help their opponent out, and if you do, why with something so obvious? Don't talk during a chess game and don't do something like this. Again this is justified.
"Constantly fidgeting, sliding their chair, or tapping their fingers on the table"
This reminds me of sliiiiiiiiiding pieces across the board in contact with the board surface. Not only was that annoying, but this is even worse because it is constant. Don't annoy your opponent when playing, so again this is justified.
"Tossing captured pieces into the 'pile'"
Please respectfully put your pieces into your chess pile, and don't make any distractions and don't be so downright careless. Justified.
"Knocking down their king onto the board surface as a resignation move"
Remember the game with Mr. Nice and Mr. Mean I was telling you about? Mr. Mean resigned not by putting out his hand, not by saying I resign, but he knocked his king down onto the board surface. This alone may not be so bad, but he knocked it down so hard it fell to the floor and almost to the game next to them. This was entirely rude and this pet peeve is entirely justified.
"Taunting, insulting, putting down oves, or overtly gloating over a won position"
If you are already winning please down gloat or taunt about it. We've al watched the cartoons as kids saying that bragging is bad, and it is. People will think of you as a jerk and someone who doesn't know how to win. Not only is bragging bad in chess, but it's bad in life. This is justified.
Goodbye.

well there is that guy who keeps jadoobing all his pieces until you make a move, then there is the one who lies back in his chair to snooze with his face pointing at the ceiling. plonkers!
"not resigning lost positions"
Lost positions are not the same thing as lost games. I never resign, I go for a draw or the possibility of a blunder by my opponent. I have a friend who often comments that I should just resign, shakes his head. I can recall at LEAST 3 games with him where the "lost" position turned into a draw or win for me. I always joke with him and say:
"Nobody ever won a game by resigning... though many have tried!"
I think he's finally starting to get it!

Also, at the National Chess Congress in Philadelphia last year, I saw a young girl (11 years old I think) rated about 1800 (won't give away her name though) playing a 1950-type player and they were in a complex rook ending where she had less than a minute and he had around twelve minutes. At some point she paused the clock and tried to claim "normal means to win", saying that her opponent wasn't staying within the "normal means to win" since he seemed to be trying to flag her. Of course the TD didn't care and said it was an invalid claim. Needless to say with almost no time (it was well after time control, so no end in sight to her time trouble either) in a complicated position against a much better opponent, she lost, and actually she started crying after the game :/
Even if it had been a valid claim for USCF, there was a lot of play in the position and it was clear that while her opponent certainly was trying to use her time pressure to his advantage, he was doing so reasonably and making good moves, trying to win the game on the board. So there's no way she should have gotten the call even if it had been a legit claim. So stuff like this is really annoying, as well. (Note: I copied most of this from something I posted in another thread about the "normal means" rule because I didn't feel like typing it again).

@Bawker What's your rating? If you're 1000, then it makes sense for you not to resign. If you're 1900, down a rook for no comp against another 1900, it's ridiculous to play on.
dpnorman,
I agree with you on principle... but even 1900 rated players occasionally make mistakes or do an inadvertent 3-fold repetition. I'm enough of a bastard that I'm all over that action... in my mind it's part of the rules, part of the game, and I would be a fool to not try and use it to my advantage!
Now... dude has set me up for a 4 move rolling rook mate, or we're 2 moves from an obvious queen mate at the edge, I'll probably resign to a really good player. Anything or anyone else? I'm going for the draw, no matter the remoteness of the possibility!

My students and I play the Orlando tournaments 3 or 4 times a year. All of us agree that the #1 thing that drives us crazy... is the guy that leaves the game for a cigeratte break (outside the hotel smoking area) only to come back in and breathe out what was left of their smoking break in your face. I doubt its done on purpose and its not like there blowing smoke in your face... its more like exhaling while deep in thought. My students and I pay 60-100.00 entry fees to play tournament chess and all of us try to bring our A game to every game... but Camel cigeratte smoke in the face makes it all the more difficult to focus...
Just remember though, folks. A brilliant mind (take me for example...) can easily transition into idiot troll behavior at will. However, idiot trolls will NEVER have the ability to be brilliant and carry on an intelligent conversation about meaningful topics.
At least that's what your momma told me...