What rating is classified as 'advance'??????


Interesting, In my personal opinion I would say 1800+
All relative and a matter of personal opinion. I put it something like so for chess.com ratings:
<800 just learning, 801-1200 beginner, 1201-1600 intermediate, 1601-2000 no-mans land/strong intermediate, 2001-2400 advanced, 2400+ master.

I would consider anyone with a 1800+ OTB rating to be formidable (or at least advanced) players. Here's how I would divide the formidable classes up:
[1] 1800-1999: Advanced
[2] 2000-2199: Expert (or Candidate Master)
[3] 2200-2399: Master [Level 1]
[4] 2400-2599: Master [Level 2]
[5] 2600+: World-Class

The strongest non-masters are just below 2200 OTB... so as others have said, a class or two below 2200 could be called advanced.
By "class" I mean 200 points.

All relative and a matter of personal opinion. I put it something like so for chess.com ratings:
<800 just learning, 801-1200 beginner, 1201-1600 intermediate, 1601-2000 no-mans land/strong intermediate, 2001-2400 advanced, 2400+ master.
Well put, I agree with you but I would say 1700-2000 not 1600-2000.But thanks for sharing!!))

1800+ is advanced.
Yeah 1800-1900 is where player is at the start of the advance list!

your rating is "advanced"
Thanks man! but I would say more like 1800 because 1800s have alot more stratiges then 1700's.Anyway thanks for sharing !!!!

your rating is "advanced"
Thanks man! but I would say more like 1800 because 1800s have alot more stratiges then 1700's.Anyway thanks for sharing !!!!
You may be right but i think the 1800 think the same of 1900 .
And this go so on endlessly ,at the end there is Magnus ,but Magnus isnt happy because of his actual form .

your rating is "advanced"
Thanks man! but I would say more like 1800 because 1800s have alot more stratiges then 1700's.Anyway thanks for sharing !!!!
You may be right but i think the 1800 think the same of 1900 .
And this go so on endlessly ,at the end there is Magnus ,but Magnus isnt happy because of his actual form .

1800+. Anything below that implies big gaps in a person's play. Once you get to about 1800 you are usually know a thing or two in every aspect of play, although of course there will still be weaknesses.

there are many standards and not all are the same. if i would have to mix some standards that i know
perhaps around 1600-2200
Good point!,Thanks for sharing!

1800+. Anything below that implies big gaps in a person's play. Once you get to about 1800 you are usually know a thing or two in every aspect of play, although of course there will still be weaknesses.
ghezz thats insane that ur 2200, thanks for sharing

1800+. Anything below that implies big gaps in a person's play. Once you get to about 1800 you are usually know a thing or two in every aspect of play, although of course there will still be weaknesses.
ghezz thats insane that ur 2200, thanks for sharing
I've not played many rapid games so that rating isn't very 'robust'. I'm less in real life.