What would you do if you could beat stockfish 8 or any engine on earth?

Coo coo for cocoa puffs!^^^

Demonstrate to the readers here that you are genuinely as good as you say, by the simple procedure of winning games here on chess.com and thereby get in the top 100 of players here. Then you can apply to teach your absolute chess mastery to the rest of us.

BTW if it didn't take the time of 25 consecutive 15 minute games I could just easily play a strong opponent, but perhaps i will challenge any reader of this post. 

Here it is, I challenge ANYONE the STRONGER the BETTER, try me.  Not scared one bit.  And you will be able to brag that you played me before I was famous!  (2000 or higher please) hopefully Naka or Carlsen so I can rest my case!

*Crickets*

Alright all you doubters, here is the proof!  

I just woke up and smashed (no anti-computer strategy) chess.com level 10 computer, as well as a number of other engines on their hardest levels, using rapid time controls (about 10 minutes).  AND It was EASY!  

Btw, in the game i am posting I also scored a caps of 99.12  vs Computer level 10's cap of 98.75!  High caps is harder to achieve versus harder opponents, so a high CAPS versus a Super GM strength computer is extremely rare!  I scored 72.4% best move with 58 excellent moves versus Computer Lvl 10's 67.8% with 56 excellent moves and my average difference was .04 versus .06.  Also please note the only "inaccurate" move I made was move 17 which only simplified the win, without move 17 my average difference would have been .00 or even a NEGATIVE value (impossible!).

You will notice i played a very human game and did not cheat.  Also i could do it again and again, no matter the opening...

Who else knows if I achieve this then I am already a SUPER GM whether the title is official or not the achievements (multiple times) is quite clear enough!  I also played top level (25) versus the 3d chess game app, but top level on it was super easy.  I tried chessmaster ultimate edition versus chessmaster, and it too was super easy win!  BTW my computer is one of the fastest in the state!  World Championship here i come!

I've been producing these more readily than carbon dioxide and now have a number of brilliant games with never before seen mating tactics!  There will be much more to come as the world welcomes the new champion and the new age of chess as I am at least 3500 elo now according to my impossible but yet true victories!

Oh here is the game...

and of course its game and i went on to easily and simply finish off the chess.com level 10 computer.  If you can evaluate this game using chess.com eval you will see just how bad white is whooping the computer level 10.

If you thought that was impressive, check out my games versus stockfish 8 with rapid time controls!  SF8 is harder than chess.com computer level 10, but the result are the same.  Stockfish 8 is even no match for me.

I do all this and all i get is called a TROLL!  not fair!

That game is not ended. I would gladly believe you, but I need a game that ends in checkmate

Be bored to tears, as there is no one to play competitively.  

I Beat The OP with a fools mate. It was the most boring minute of my life.

Nobody cares about your proof outside of the chess.com stats because we know we can trust them so other proves or one-off games are irrelevant.

Your stats show the average rating of opponents to who you lost was 1775.

Your stats show your global ranking as #13,200 which is very good (and better than mine), but hardly world class.

you can look in this guys previous games, he is terrible at chess and his opponent gets any sort of positional or material advantage he quits the game......HE QUITS EVERY OTHER GAME....... and goes on to play another 1600 or lesser player

Interesting how all of these responses have nothing to do with the original post's question...

I have not played one game with anyone commenting above.  For those who hear i quit my games early or my chess.com rating reflects my strength, -they are in err as I pick up a weak and intermittent internet signal which is the reason for 95% of my losses.  As such, my daily games (where I play experts) could be used as a better indicator of my strength since signal loss is hardly a factor.  Please review those games before passing judgement on my claim.  As you will notice, 95% of my losses in daily games were from won positions where i just forgot to check if it was my turn.  I have a busy life so it is common for me to lose games this way.

You see, strangely i can lose to a amateur any day.  BUT if i want to, I just apply my little secret and not even the strongest computer can stop me from achieving my goal.

It has been some months since my experience of revelation in regards to chess and its subsequent results.  In retrospect I will perhaps reveal a bit more so all of you readers can understand.

In very short summary:

Everyone plays chess different.  Each person judges and weighs positions according to principles, intuition or countless other factors.  If a persons factors are weighted/valued more correctly than his opponent he should win.  But here is the interesting part...Tell me, what is the most important factor to consider for winning chess?  (I hear you all saying: "it depends", "king safety", "center control", "development", "activity", "mobility", "attacking", "flexibility", "psychology", "studying", etc, etc, etc)  So we mortals do have difficulty even answering this question.  What's my point?  Well, if someone truly knew this most important factor, (i do) and the factor was prioritized over other factors in chess (that's what i did), then the result would be a win against any opponent  whose factors were not as pure, fundamental and most important.

Ever wonder how a GM plays such great chess even during speed chess?  I wondered that too, but now i know each GM has a set of factors with values corresponding to prioritization which are much more correctly ordered than the values of lesser players.  But the kicker is from my viewpoint you can see how much GMs don't understand.  For instance, because computers calculate on programmer defined values who do not know even the fundamental principle to all of chess, the programs spit out second rate lines no matter their speed.

I value one factor above all others and the results were instantaneous.  Chess at the GM level becomes the starting point of my method and it is strong enough that it allows me to beat Super GMs and Chess.com's engine (easily).  However, Stockfish 8 is much more difficult for my method which i found needed refinement at about 3300 elo.

For all of those interested I have been taking time off to write a book which is helping me refine my method.  It is my hope that all of chess will be transformed quickly by greater understanding like no other time in all of chess history.

Hi all, I thought some doubters might be interested in my recent wins versus #27 worldwide master ChessNinja48 as well as wins over 20 experts, most in the top 2000 worldwide.  I also just posted a game vs stockfish8 disguised as an expert player, unenbahlam, in which I held my own.  So to those calling me names such as moron, troll, fraud....I rest my case!

BTW, every game can be found on my profile blog and with any analysis one can see I am not cheating.

I have recently won a number of very significant games, it turns out I was not trolling.  These past few months I have multiple wins versus players in the top 500 world wide (see it on my blog).  Where have all the doubters gone?  Where are the name callers? 

Okay, okay, for all of you who are wondering how I am playing games with 0-5 centipawn loss, I am very very near completion of my book.  Hopefully, it will be available this november!!!

Since you live 6hrs from St Louis Chess Club, I would challenge Carlsen or Anand to a high stakes ( your $$$ vs thier $$$) OTB match, because Im not sure the any elite could match your accomplishments against the engines!

Since the post was about what someone would do if they could beat engines, I would suggest entering tournaments and making serious money. If you can't do that, then play on chess.com and smash all the GMs and high ranked players. 

Now, since the games you've posted are not full games, I have no reason to believe what you are saying. If you posted a set of games where you crushed Stockfish on the highest levels then I'd believe you. 

@Vectible,

The amazing thing is I am not using an engine, just look at the games (this link should make it easy enough for you)  .  And I am not a troll, but your rashness to judge before even analyzing the games I have provided does make you look like a troll.  For those who read this I am honest and I share what I know with others to help others, my intentions are pure and true.  Furthermore, I understand everyone's skeptical positions, but what else can I do but include those games for analysis so everyone can see that I have of 100 victories over the worlds best players?

Please check out my profile and read about me to find out just how I can play such strong chess after a single moment of understanding!  You can too!

@Vectible, you may be able to beat me as I honestly still lose to low rated players, but please take note of the anomaly, that I honestly too have beat many masters and got better positions vs the worlds #1 and worlds #2 online players (and countless other top 100 players around the global ), AND I commonly get the better position, evaluation and game versus even Stockfish 9.  Sometimes, I can use general ideas to get ahead a pawn and sometimes I have the extra outer pawn with a huge advantage game, as the 1 of the 3 Me vs SF games shows.  

As I have said, getting the advantage is the part I can do almost flawlessly, but making my opponent lose cannot be forced, aside from exploiting general ideas which are too complex for evaluation in the late middle game such as trading the right bishop, etc....