Whats the fastest way to get out of the beginner level?

Sort:
CantGetRight69

For those past the beginner stage if you had to learn chess all over again from scratch, whats the first thing you would do to get out of the beginner state and to the intermediate skill level?

 

I've got things like lucas chess and have a lot of ebooks but progress seems slow. Is there a clear cut streamlined way for me to get out of being a beginner and move to the intermediate level where the real fun begins? Chess seems like theres no clear cut way to learn it unlike say mathematics where you start with addition then move up. It seems in chess everyone has their own opinion on what to learn but is there a step by step process to learning chess? I'd like to get to that 1500-1600 intermediate level as soon as possible because being a beginner is no fun when you don't know what to do or how to think about certain boards.

Cherub_Enjel

Tactics. And ditch the engines and fancy software for now - I got to 1300 OTB rating (which is like 1500 daily rating here equivalent) with only a few basic chess books that focused on tactics.

In particular, I recommend only one book: "Back to Basics: Tactics" by Heisman. Read it again and again and again, and apply the principles, and listen to what he says in the book, and soon you'll be at least 1600. (Well, not soon, but relatively quickly - it takes a long time for chess improvement in general). 

Also, chess can be like math in that you need basic principles before you can move on to advanced stuff.

 

If you want to get a comprehensive idea of what a game of chess is all about (like the basic building blocks of math), then read my blog post: how to understand everything in chess, which I've linked on my profile description. That might be a good start for you.

aloofandpoofed

There may be a straightforward answer to your question.

I'm okay at daily chess but have been working with a coach to work on my overall game. And in the process, I've been playing "homework" live games, at which I... am less than adept presently.

At the rock bottom beginner level, the "low hanging fruit" seems to be:

  1. checking for undefended pieces you or your opponent can capture for free, then defending yours and taking theirs
  2. trying to figure out what your opponent can do to you in the current position instead of just thinking of what you can do
  3. keeping it simple

And after each game, play through it again, alone or with your opponent or a stronger friend, and try to find something you could have done better.

I'm oversimplifying a little here, but it seems that a beginner can become quite a bit better by just working on even one or two of these ideas. Each one has the benefit of making it easier to play a better game by avoiding trouble.

Bonsai_Dragon

Not to be funny, but if you're seriously asking what's the fastest way, that way is to quit the game. Patience...whats the rush?

llama

If you only do 1 thing, do tactics. I don't have the Heisman book Cherub mentioned, but I looked it up on amazon (table of contents) and it looks excellent.

To be a well rounded player, you'll also want to learn the basics of strategy, endgames, and openings, but in the beginning tactics give you the most results for your effort. Not only are forcing moves and basic tactical patterns relevant in nearly all positions, but many of the skills you use to solve puzzles are the foundation for playing in general such as visualization of future positions.

I don't know how new you are, but if you don't already know, you should also google "opening principals" and the basic mates like "two rooks vs king mate" and "queen and king checkmate" (there are possibly 100s of places online with this information).

sparxs

If I could start all over again? Buy a tactics and an endgame book and lift my head again after six months without asking what I am doing? Even if you feel you are not learning anything, this is what I would again. I started with Eric schillers gold nuggets... it was painful

llama

By the way, I also really like Seirawan's Winning Chess series of books. One book for openings, for endgames, for tactics, and for strategy. Those are the main ones. The other 3 are an intro book, a game collection book, and a book on sacrifices I think? But IMO the first 4 I mention are the main ones.

Maybe it's depressing to be told to read 4 books tongue.png. Definitely not necessary if all you want is to move past beginner. But if you wanted something like a curriculum you get at school, this might be close.

Graf_Nachthafen

1) play more

2) post less on the forums

Graf_Nachthafen
2Q1C hat geschrieben:

 


Whenever you have any question no matter how dumb you think it is or any thought about chess no matter how silly, make sure you post it on the forums.

 

 

There are too many established specialists for this on the forums already.

TalSpin

Tactics, longer time controls so you can actually think and perfect the openings you play. You don't have to know theory 20 moves deep, just the strategies of your repertoire and any traps you might get caught in or may be able to catch an unsuspecting opponent in. Tactics alone will take you to 1800+ if you really study them.

Sqod

If I were serious and had to start over again, and if I had the money, I think I'd play against the computer at ever-increasing levels and hire a coach rated at least 1800 to give feedback while I played against that computer, especially before I made each move. I'd also either take notes or have him take notes while all that was going on, as a permanent record of what to study/review later. I'd also try to select an opening quickly that fit my style (the coach could help out here, too) so that I could learn the traps, unit placements, plans, typical tactics, and typical middlegames and endgames that resulted from that opening, instead of needing to go through a long period of trying different openings, each of which has its own characteristic set of traps and placements and tactics and plans. Ideally the coach would know a lot of the opening heuristics that aren't documented in books and teach me those as they occurred in the games. On the side, with somewhat lower priority, I'd study tactics, puzzles, master games, tactic types, mate types, and more.

Monie49
Study
Brazilian1996

JUST DO HOW ALL ANCIENT PLAYERS DID: READ GOOD BOOKS (also solve tactics from books like "Combinational motifs", by Blokh)!

 

I have read 5 books, was a 1300 player. Now I am 1900 (here in chess.com, but in lichess I am 2000 player).

 

Read books! SLOWLY... really try to understand what they are saying... try to solve the positions before the autor explain anything.

 

Man, stop play more than 1 hour per day blitz and bullet online games. Stop to solve dumb tactics online. It's not the same to play in a real board, with real pieces, with a good tactic exercise book, you trying to solve that deeply (1 hour to solve 3 good exercises - some times I can solve 6 exercises in 1 hour, others time, just 1 exercise in this same period), seeing all variantions... Man, it's different. Stop all that shit. Well, at least for me, what work is: study with concentration a good book that teach the Chess fundamentals (a book that cover all essential parts of the game - to opening from endings), and solve some good tactic book with a lot of strong exercises, that make you spend 1 hour to solve 2, 3 or 4 exercies with long variants. haha

 

This is working with me, my rating is trash for a moment because i don't traning correctly (I am too lazy), but belive me: I know how to improve, and in the end of this year I will come back here to show my 2100 rating (i all the three common modes: blitz, bullet, standard).

fewlio

my belief in this.  blitz and rapid are fine, maybe you enjoy it the most even in classical you can get in time pressure and then the fast thinking will help you.  However, I'd focus on longer format games first, and get into blitz later.  I don't think you should play any fast games starting out because you can't really understand or learn anything that way.  It's like guitar playing...learning a song.  Play slow, painfully slow, until you can hit the notes, it's not wildly entertaining because it doesn't sound like the song when you play slow.  But you speed up, slowly, until at the end it is fun and beautiful and correct!  Now you are playing! 

bong711

Never read Bruce Pandolfinis books. Readers stay longer at beginners level.

LogoCzar
Sqod wrote:

If I were serious and had to start over again, and if I had the money, I think I'd play against the computer at ever-increasing levels and hire a coach rated at least 1800 to give feedback while I played against that computer, especially before I made each move. I'd also either take notes or have him take notes while all that was going on, as a permanent record of what to study/review later. I'd also try to select an opening quickly that fit my style (the coach could help out here, too) so that I could learn the traps, unit placements, plans, typical tactics, and typical middlegames and endgames that resulted from that opening, instead of needing to go through a long period of trying different openings, each of which has its own characteristic set of traps and placements and tactics and plans. Ideally the coach would know a lot of the opening heuristics that aren't documented in books and teach me those as they occurred in the games. On the side, with somewhat lower priority, I'd study tactics, puzzles, master games, tactic types, mate types, and more.

Why wouldn't you be able to become 1800+ as an adult?
Look at the progress of Millern and Solskytz, among others. 

Sqod
logozar wrote:
Why wouldn't you be able to become 1800+ as an adult?

 

I'm not sure I understand your question. I'm using the formal definition of "beginner," which is someone under 1000. (Oh my God, it's a Pandolfini book! No *wonder* I never advanced past beginner stage. happy.png)

----------

(p. 203)
Rating Chart   A table or list of USCF rating categories. The various
classes are:

   CATEGORY           USCF RATING
Master             2200 and above
Candidate Master   2000-2199
Class A            1800-1999
Class B            1600-1799
Class C            1400-1599
Class D            1200-1399
Class E            1000-1199
Beginner           Below 1000

 

Pandolfini, Bruce. 1995. Chess Thinking. New York: Simon & Schuster.

 

kindaspongey

"... Just because a book contains lots of information that you don’t know, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it will be extremely helpful in making you better at this point in your chess development. ..." - Dan Heisman (2001)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626180930/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman06.pdf

"... The books that are most highly thought of are not necessarily the most useful. Go with those that you find to be readable; ..." - GM Nigel Davies (2010)

teorems

Giuoco piano, play slowly! 

kindaspongey

Possibly of interest:

Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Simple-Attacking-Plans-77p3731.htm
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1949)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
Discovering Chess Openings by GM John Emms (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/catalog/excerpts/openings_amateurs.pdf
Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Chess_Endgames_for_Kids.pdf
A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Seirawan stuff:
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm