which is beter: 2 pawns or a horse

here are some games at https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/31856400035 and https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/enC5pDtGN and https://www.chess.com/games/view/765 and https://www.chess.com/analysis and https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/quite-possibly-the-weirdest-chess-game-ever

A horse can help their owners travel around a country. Two pawns cannot.

Depends if the pawns get stuck in the horse's throat or something, but I think the horse

this is not the knight  in chess. hahaha depends if the pawns get suck in the horses throat in so wierd and funny

that sounds preeeeety true. as long as its not a pawn wedge or double pawns

yes. it depends on the position

Here's something you never thought about:

It depends on the position!

horse or bishop ~ three pawns

yeah in the ending or in some specific positions can be two pawns better but for the most moments in game is better the horse

Does it come with a saddle?

NO! STOP GIVING FACTS ABOUT A HORSE!! THIS IS THE KNIGHT!

NOW TELL ME WITCH IS BETTER! i will put in the votes.

Witches are even better cause they can use magik!

you can't ride 2 pawns, but the upkeep on a horse is out of this world.