Dear Andy,
May I say, with regard to your previous comment in this forum about IQ tests (see below): I hope and pray it was an example of your well-known "jocularity." (tsk, tsk...)
"They measure your ability to stack blocks. That's about it."
Alas!! I'm driven Once Again to "explain" IQ tests:
1) They are All arbitrary.
2) The "traditional" ones, like the WISC, are made up of "subtests" which Do actually include "arranging blocks in patterns." (NOT "Stacking Them," you silly boy!)
3) Among its 10 subtests, the WISC measures: commonsense reasoning, abstract reasoning, vocabulary, social intuition (as measured by putting cartoon panels in order!), clerical skills, ability to do mental arithmetic, short-term auditory memory, assembling 2-dimensional puzzles, store of cultural information, etc.
4) Using This traditional system, average "IQ" is 100. The scores have a "standard deviation" --- (Yes, Andy It's a Real statistical term! --- so No Giggling about "deviations" or "deviates," and, omg, seriously, how old Are you?! ) --- Anyway, one "standard deviation" is 16. Thus, an IQ above 132 makes one, well, technically .... oh, well .... let's just say "Really, Really Smart!" But note: That's Only according to those Old 'IQ Test' Inventors, like Binet and Wechsler.
I do hope that clears up Everything! !
Your Continuing Source for Accurate Psychological Information,
MIL
showoffy little bastards!