Why hasn't a good chess analysis LLM been developed yet?

Sort:
Avatar of teju17
LLMs like gemini explain code and educational content well 90 percent of the time but there's no LLM that explains chess moves well. Why?
Avatar of chesssblackbelt

Because nearly every position in chess is unique and LLMs can't think for themselves

Avatar of teju17
chesssblackbelt wrote:

Because nearly every position in chess is unique and LLMs can't think for themselves

So you are saying that LLMs provide good explanations only on those topics that are factual, not analytical and not something new?

What about those math solving LLMs? Don't they 'solve' a problem? If it works for math up to a satisfactory degree, why not for chess?