AgileElephants wrote:
He has clearly violated chess.com's fair play rules (namely using someone else's account).
https://twitter.com/chesscom/status/1775558685827236198
Why is Kramnik not banned yet?
Sort:
Apr 3, 2024
0
#3
If I did what Kramnik did and got caught, I would have my account closed in no time. Pretty sure of that. Double standards?
Apr 3, 2024
0
#4
Why did he do this? I mean what advantages did he get by doing this? He clearly has account so why not use your own.
Switching his name to see if the suspects still perform so highly against him.
No he wasn’t smurfing imo. He was trying to see if his suspected cheaters would lose to him if they didn’t know he was Kramnik. I think the other player must have thought it was reasonable to test and allowed his account to be used for this purpose.
AgileElephants wrote:
He has clearly violated chess.com's fair play rules (namely using someone else's account).
that's not fair play rules
Apr 5, 2024
0
#8
IM_C0ZM0_0 wrote:
AgileElephants wrote:
He has clearly violated chess.com's fair play rules (namely using someone else's account).
that's not fair play rules
It is indeed fair play rules. From chess.com fair-play policy
"Do not use anyone else's account."
It provides an unfair advantage as the opponent played an opening they knew Khismtullin isn't very familiar with. The problem is that Kramnik is pretty much the biggest advocate for this opening for over a decade, so they would never play it against Kramnik
Edit: More info in this video
Apr 5, 2024
0
#9
because chess com doesnt want to anger anybody even if they are wrong at the end of the day they are a company and it is in their best interest to keep the best image of themselves although i really do want Kramnik banned
Noo0bb wrote:
because chess com doesnt want to anger anybody even if they are wrong at the end of the day they are a company and it is in their best interest to keep the best image of themselves although i really do want Kramnik banned
Don't want to anger anybody? LuL
Apr 5, 2024
0
#11
err0r909 wrote:
Noo0bb wrote:
because chess com doesnt want to anger anybody even if they are wrong at the end of the day they are a company and it is in their best interest to keep the best image of themselves although i really do want Kramnik banned
Don't want to anger anybody? LuL
some people are on kramniks side even though its not a lot
Noo0bb wrote:
err0r909 wrote:
Noo0bb wrote:
because chess com doesnt want to anger anybody even if they are wrong at the end of the day they are a company and it is in their best interest to keep the best image of themselves although i really do want Kramnik banned
Don't want to anger anybody? LuL
some people are on kramniks side even though its not a lot
I don't judge Kramniks or whoever, but chess.com ban's with a finger click. Because I am not that Kramnik?
Apr 5, 2024
0
#13
err0r909 wrote:
Noo0bb wrote:
err0r909 wrote:
Noo0bb wrote:
because chess com doesnt want to anger anybody even if they are wrong at the end of the day they are a company and it is in their best interest to keep the best image of themselves although i really do want Kramnik banned
Don't want to anger anybody? LuL
some people are on kramniks side even though its not a lot
I don't judge Kramniks or whoever, but chess.com ban's with a finger click. Because I am not that Kramnik?
i dont understand
Noo0bb wrote:
err0r909 wrote:
Noo0bb wrote:
err0r909 wrote:
Noo0bb wrote:
because chess com doesnt want to anger anybody even if they are wrong at the end of the day they are a company and it is in their best interest to keep the best image of themselves although i really do want Kramnik banned
Don't want to anger anybody? LuL
some people are on kramniks side even though its not a lot
I don't judge Kramniks or whoever, but chess.com ban's with a finger click. Because I am not that Kramnik?
i dont understand
Been there banned for no reason after a month working myself up ending 1st place up to elite and some arsebit clown report forum talk, voila> ban
then yu get mails after a week, for a second profile and got in touch with some mod... they changed my password as it is impossible otherwise from my side with keyholder.
Now I'm here again...
Had to send them 8 mails to activate account also. for each of last 2.
Apr 5, 2024
0
#17
err0r909 wrote:
Had to send them 8 mails to activate account also. for each of last 2.
you and Kramnik are not the same he is accusing multiple prodigies of cheating without evidence and he keeps harassing them because he is a grumpy old man
Noo0bb wrote:
err0r909 wrote:
Had to send them 8 mails to activate account also. for each of last 2.
you and Kramnik are not the same he is accusing multiple prodigies of cheating without evidence and he keeps harassing them because he is a grumpy old man
Then he has to be prosecuted if it was up to me not only ban I was for way less, also I dunno that chap... Just never was interested in chess until now (or recently) as I went to normal browsing behavior and to pass time.
He has clearly violated chess.com's fair play rules (namely using someone else's account).