Forums

Why Is the Rook so Short?

Sort:
HorribleTomato

It's built short and stout

nullso when it falls off nullit will be less likely to break, since it's in the corner and when you turn the corner it's usually like thisnullSo since the rook has a tougher build, it [probably] won't end up like that guy up there

FBloggs
HorribleTomato wrote:

It's built short and stout

so when it falls off it will be less likely to break, since it's in the corner and when you turn the corner it's usually like thisSo since the rook has a tougher build, it [probably] won't end up like that guy up there

Very good.  wink.png

FBloggs

And it's time for another game.

FBloggs

The Skewer Lure.

 

HorribleTomato

Excuse me? Best move was gxh8=R# checkmate with style people!

FBloggs
HorribleTomato wrote:

Excuse me? Best move was gxh8=R# checkmate with style people!

I disagree. Underpromotion is cool only when it's the best move. But of course it's not cool when promoting to a queen would result in immediate stalemate; that's just avoiding a blunder. And I think it's uncool to underpromote when it makes no difference. If either a queen or rook would mate immediately, I think underpromoting to a rook comes across as showing off. It's kind of like a guy trying to be cool. If he's trying to be cool, he's not. As a naturally cool guy, I recommend against underpromotion unless it's the best move.  wink.png

FBloggs

Traffic has slowed. I might have to hire some entertainers. 

FBloggs

All right, you knuckleheads! Get off your butts and post something!  evil.png

chessspy1

The Butrint object.

Found in Algeria

5th century 

null

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:
 

Is that a rook? What period? You're the historian, for Pete's sake!  wink.png

FBloggs

@chessspy1:  And that reminds me. Everybody's been waiting for the history of board games lecture. Just yesterday one of the guys said, "Hey, Bloggs, you keep bragging that your thread has an official historian but I ain't learnin' no history in this joint!" 

chessspy1

Ok history of board games 101

null

chessspy1

A series of 49 small carved painted stones were found at the 5,000-year-old Başur Höyük burial mound in southeast Turkey. These are the earliest gaming pieces ever found. Similar pieces have been found in Syria and Iraq and seem to point to board games originating in the Fertile Crescent. The Crescent is comprised of regions around the Nile, Tigris, and Euphrates River in the Middle East.

null

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

A series of 49 small carved painted stones were found at the 5,000-year-old Başur Höyük burial mound in southeast Turkey. These are the earliest gaming pieces ever found. Similar pieces have been found in Syria and Iraq and seem to point to board games originating in the Fertile Crescent. The Crescent is comprised of regions around the Nile, Tigris, and Euphrates River in the Middle East.

 

Well, that was a good lecture, albeit a brief one. Damn, why didn't they have lectures like that when I was in college? Just in case it's on the test, which one is the rook?

FBloggs

Okay, I've finished cramming for the final. Fortunately, I took good notes. I'm ready for 102.

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

The Butrint object.

Found in Algeria

5th century 

 

I see you slid the description in when I wasn't looking. How does the Butrint object move? And can the King object and Butrint object force mate? I just want to make sure we're dealing with a major object. After all, this thread is about the Rook object.

FBloggs

@president_max: If it wasn't impossible, I might think you found a better thread. We need to discuss your attendance. You're in danger of failing the semester.

FBloggs
ilovesmetuna wrote:

gee this thread sure died

I wouldn't go that far! It has slowed a bit lately but it has bounced back from other slow periods. We'll get to 1000 posts.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

The rook should be the tallest piece. Castles are 30 times larger than any soldier or knight

EndgameEnthusiast2357

The rook should be 10 feet high