The improvements are wonderful, and it makes sense that features should be premium only, why not, they need to make money. The idea is that the features that free players are used to shouldn't be regressed; for me, my analysis is working fine now, so I may have got unlucky and tried mid-update. My mobile versions haven't changed either. I actually have a diamond membership on my main account, so I support the site, but if the free version is still feature rich then new players (like my wife) are more enticed to upgrade.
No Analysis For Free Users
Sort:
I don't care
willitrhyme wrote:
OP mentioned Lichess and didn't get muted immediately afterwards...?
Very progressive of you, Chess.com. 😀
Seems like it got edited out haha
I will strongly suggest you to use the other open source absolutely free chess site called [removed -- VP]. I am bound to not mention the name otherwise my comment will get deleted. Chess.com was great and i am using it for over a year. But now, due to their unfair and greedy tactics I am very disappointed and unattracted towards the site. I also dropped the plan to buy subscription.
HomelessBook wrote:
I will strongly suggest you to use the other open source absolutely free chess site called xyz. I am bound to not mention the name otherwise my comment will get deleted. Chess.com was great and i am using it for over a year. But now, due to their unfair and greedy tactics I am very disappointed and unattracted towards the site. I also dropped the plan to buy subscription.
But your account says you have only been a member for 21 days.
How many accounts do you have?
I had the new feature yesterday but now it is back original one. I don't understand why the paying members are replying sarcastically, as if the free members are asking the whole site to be free
When you have been here for a while and see complaints after every single attempted improvement to the site, you will not be surprised by it.