Why did a moderator remove 1000 reply thread???

Sort:
u335394862
netzach wrote:

[comment deleted by Mod God]

was that really a mod?

pdela
335394862 wrote:
netzach wrote:

[comment deleted by Mod God]

was that really a mod?

yes!, hey why do you have me blocked?, I don't even know you

falcogrine

pdela, it was an infamous thread. It is gone now, and had over 1000 posts. It was started by someone with a username of "daeth" who had really bad spelling. 

Conflagration_Planet
falcogrine wrote:

pdela, it was an infamous thread. It is gone now, and had over 1000 posts. It was started by someone with a username of "daeth" who had really bad spelling. 

Not gone. Just moved to off topic.

u335394862
pdela wrote:
335394862 wrote:
netzach wrote:

[comment deleted by Mod God]

was that really a mod?

yes!, hey why do you have me blocked?, I don't even know you

i blocked u? hmmmmm let me unblock u sry bout that

netzach

Unblocked.

netzach
335394862 wrote:
netzach wrote:

[comment deleted by Mod God]

was that really a mod?

Yep. It was Etrik.

goldendog

Where should threads that aren't dealing with chess be?

OP is ridiculous.

u335394862

off topic much?

DrSpudnik

For some reason, it's still in help & support.

Knightly_News

The thread's topic was related to chess. Many threads have plenty of replies and subthreads that go off topic and aren't removed, and isn't fair to punish a thread or disenfranchise the participants with arbitrary capricious censorship. But I know the unfair biased unjust arbitrarily and non-uniformly applied abuse of power that the moderators victimized me with, without warning, notice, discussion or recourse. a premium paying member for three years, will come back and nail them, maybe even in a more serious context, and when that happens and they are pissed and betrayed and wondering why, they shouldn't because its their own petty power abusing crap returning to teach them a lesson about not abusing power anywhere.

goldendog

The thread left chess entirely. It was barely on chess from the beginning.

Quasi-chess-related at best, in the beginning.

You squawk like you had something valuable that got ruined.

Knightly_News

goldendog wrote:

The thread left chess entirely. It was barely on chess from the beginning.

Quasi-chess-related at best, in the beginning.

You squawk like you had something valuable that got ruined.

=====

I put a lot of time and energy into it i would not have if I knew some closet Fascist was going to abuse their position that late in the thread. It is too non-uniform and subjectively attacked to justify. Next time you or the moderators get pissed off at an analogous situation you are on the wrong side of and angry at the perceived or very real sense of injustice you suffer under, just remember your own hubris and disregard for genuinely fair play in this case

TheGrobe

The threads still here, in case you missed it.

ilikeflags

i sure miss it

AndyClifton

"Let it be on YOUR head!..."

Knightly_News

TheGrobe wrote:

The threads still here, in case you missed

ot.

====

That doesn't justify it

Conquistador
reflectivist wrote:

goldendog wrote:

The thread left chess entirely. It was barely on chess from the beginning.

Quasi-chess-related at best, in the beginning.

You squawk like you had something valuable that got ruined.

=====

I put a lot of time and energy into it i would not have if I knew some closet Fascist was going to abuse their position that late in the thread. It is too non-uniform and subjectively attacked to justify. Next time you or the moderators get pissed off at an analogous situation you are on the wrong side of and angry at the perceived or very real sense of injustice you suffer under, just remember your own hubris and disregard for genuinely fair play in this case

But you haven't denied that it was no longer chess related where it migrated (which was the reason why it was moved to off-topic).

So your problem is...?

*Hu hu hu*  I liked my thread getting attention even though it wasn't chess related and the mods moved it to off-topic where it gets less attention.  WAHH! -reflectivist

Temper tantrum much?

ilikeflags

TheGrobe
reflectivist wrote:

TheGrobe wrote:

The threads still here, in case you missed

ot.

====

That doesn't justify it

Justify what?  Re-categorizing it?

I think maybe you lack a certain sense of proportion.