7/30/2016 - Sometimes 2 bishops are better than queen + rook

Sort:
MarcoBR444

Two puzzles.

The second one is a continuation of the game, because the opponent did not solve the first puzzle.

First: black to move:

 

Second puzzle: white to move.

See the original game in the link below, post # 1915.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/the-most-interesting-game-of-chess-was-played-here-in-chesscom?page=96

Bilbo21

This should really be called 'Sometimes 2 bishops are better than queen + rook if you are playing an idiot who sets up a suicidal position for himself'

DoctorStrange

Nice

DoctorStrange

second one was stupid. But you won by luck..

GuessWhoIAm

Luck all the way.

MarcoBR444

Ok, if you think I was lucky, how about ANAND?

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/more-puzzles/892016---play-like-a-top-gm

justcheckin99
Bilbo21 wrote:

This should really be called 'Sometimes 2 bishops are better than queen + rook if you are playing an idiot who sets up a suicidal position for himself'

assuming this isnt a work of fiction, i would say you are 100 percent correct.

i suspect it is a fake thing because if you look at the first puzzle, even if you dont see the "correct" and "incorrect" thing, almost any intelligent move for black wins on the spot. the instinctive move would be to play qxr, but most people who studied the situation first would have probably played r-d1.

i think most intelligent players would agree that it would take extremely bad play from black to lose the game or they deliberately lost. (perhaps they had gotten somebody to bet against them?)

MarcoBR444
justcheckin99 wrote:
Bilbo21 wrote:

This should really be called 'Sometimes 2 bishops are better than queen + rook if you are playing an idiot who sets up a suicidal position for himself'

assuming this isnt a work of fiction, i would say you are 100 percent correct.

i suspect it is a fake thing because if you look at the first puzzle, even if you dont see the "correct" and "incorrect" thing, almost any intelligent move for black wins on the spot. the instinctive move would be to play qxr, but most people who studied the situation first would have probably played r-d1.

i think most intelligent players would agree that it would take extremely bad play from black to lose the game or they deliberately lost. (perhaps they had gotten somebody to bet against them?)

It is not fake, it is a real game.

I put the wrong link for the original game in post 1; but now I edited.

See the original game in the link below, post # 1915.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/the-most-interesting-game-of-chess-was-played-here-in-chesscom?page=96

https://lichess.org/iDcwpDcc

Arisktotle

You just proved it is fake. Not a fake game but a fake puzzle. This is a puzzle forum, not a game forum. Game fragments only allowed when they feature decent puzzles (which is rare).