Forums

Mate in 3 =D Might make u think

Sort:
Avatar of keithnem
keithnem
May 11, 2009
0
#21

you dont necessarily need to sac the queen i dont think

Avatar of Kacparov
IM Kacparov
May 11, 2009
0
#22

about 5 seconds by me Tongue out

Avatar of Lord-Chaos
Lord-Chaos
May 12, 2009
0
#23

keithnem, show me a method mate in 3 without saccing the queen.

Avatar of REVNED
REVNED
May 13, 2009
0
#24

it's not that tricky, but nice one.

Avatar of texaspete
texaspete
May 13, 2009
0
#25

Seems like only a mate in 5 without the queen sacrifice (which is what I went for to start with).

Avatar of Lord-Chaos
Lord-Chaos
May 14, 2009
0
#26

Nice analyse, but i dont think this puzzle is really that "much." My title just attracts lots of people lol =D

Avatar of Lord-Chaos
Lord-Chaos
Aug 14, 2009
0
#27

woah i remember this ages ago, i got above 850 views on this! posting from 14 August here, maybe i can get above 1000 =D any1 remember this?