Shortest-proof-game challenge
I hate those positions that must end with white to move as black couldn't have made the last move.
Those are my favorite kind.
I hate those positions that must end with white to move as black couldn't have made the last move.
This might be a fun position for y'all to try out.
I hate those positions that must end with white to move as black couldn't have made the last move.
This might be a fun position for y'all to try out. (#6041)
It's legal. Rewan will tell us how much shorter it needs to be.
It's pretty. Do you have a proof game for it? I'm sure it will take more moves than #6045.
EvinSung posted this position in the Illegal Position thread, but there it was illegal because there was a black knight at d5. How short a proof game can you find for this legal position?
It's legal. Rewan will tell us how much shorter it needs to be.
Here's a game in 34.5; Rewan will tell us how much shorter it needs to be.
White seems to have additional moves, so a more optimal black pathing will allow for a shorter game.
It's pretty. Do you have a proof game for it? I'm sure it will take more moves than #6045.
Not yet, but I think I'll work on your tree first.
EvinSung posted this position in the Illegal Position thread, but there it was illegal because there was a black knight at d5. How short a proof game can you find for this legal position?
Are you sure it's legal? So far I couldn't get that many bishops on those squares. White's last move also was an extra capture. But I'll look gain later!
The only position I ever posted should have been the version without a rook on h1, since I never created a version with the rook on h1.
Interestingly, I did create several versions with a rook on g1, which were all cooked by Jacobi. But they also had different configurations for black, and I never posted those either.