please delete this thread

Sort:
festers-siesta

This is not intended to duplicate nor compete with the existing global warming thread. It is more generally an opinion poll.

I am interested to see what the average, non-science minded person thinks about the climate issue. It seems there are several groups based on observations.

1. those with serious concerns and who are actually doing what they can to help reduce their emissions.

2. those who are concerned but don't know what to do or think they have no control.

3. those who deny there is a problem with the climate caused by human activity.

4. those who believe there is a problem but do not care.

I personally do not think there are many people in group #1 or #4.

Feel free to voice your opinion and why you feel that way.

Be aware if you make ridiculous or unrelated comments you will be blocked from the thread.

Thank you.

RonaldJosephCote

You shouldn't let playerafar get to you.....that's just how he posts. frustrated

festers-siesta

He won't be here to gum this up nor tell me I'm doing it wrong.

876543Z1

8,219,839,490 reasons why there is a climate issue.

AG120502

I’m number 1.

AG120502

But it is a secondary concern for me.

Hot_Rash

Every human is one of those reasons fr

Hot_Rash

But probably, the climate change isnt COMPLETELY our fault and is natural, but we certainly are affecting it.

festers-siesta

The climate has changed slowly over millions of years. The current change, in the past 150, is not only sudden but considerably more dangerous to humans since there are so many of us.

Hot_Rash

Its mostly natural, but we are spreading it up with Green house gas emissions

Hot_Rash

But we definitely are speeding it up

Hot_Rash

Kinda. We probably increased the overall temperatures, and dont forget just 1C° can melt the whole antartica

festers-siesta
theeldest1 wrote:

There's like no discernible change in climate at all.... and even if there is, the earth is still warming up from the Ice Age 4000 years ago after the Flood... I wouldn't worry about that too much, it's just a normal cycle over thousands of years.

Where do you get this information? What flood? There was no ice age 4000 years ago.

festers-siesta
theeldest1 wrote:

#16, Ummm the Flood that covered the whole earth? And the Ice Age that followed that?

Again, what is your source of information?

festers-siesta
JustaChessUser123 wrote:
sticking out your gyatt for the rizzler
you are so skibidi, you are so fanum tax
i just wanna be you sigma,
freaking come here. Freaking come here

blocked

festers-siesta

My sources are a few hundred years of scientific and geologic studies.

Again:

festers-siesta

You claim science courses. Home schooled or public education?

festers-siesta

I see. No science course outside of home schooling would support the bible as a scientific proof of anything. Some of the source documents of the OT are older than 4000 years and would not have survived a global flood that there is no evidence of.

BunWithGun6392
Billy-bingo wrote:
theeldest1 wrote:

#16, Ummm the Flood that covered the whole earth? And the Ice Age that followed that?

Again, what is your source of information?

Bible. For me at least.

BunWithGun6392
Billy-bingo wrote:

My sources are a few hundred years of scientific and geologic studies.

Again:

[insert image here]

why is ur volume so highhhh