I'm a barbarian. Hikaru Nakamaru is a barbarian
Am I really prodigy?

I still got prodigy:
See? With the same answers!
The test reflects on your type, not your potential or anything like that. You don't become a prodigy just because you have never cried after a game or broken something(these are the types of questions they ask in the test) containing emotions is one part of chess, but an important part is overall skill. And this test doesn't give an evaluation of that, they give a few multiple choice puzzles where you need to build an attacking plan, but in all honesty both plans probably work equally well. Plus, just because I got say assassin on my test doesn't mean my destiny is to go around mugging people on the streets of the east coast.
1000 isn't really that great for any age past 9 if you want to be this supposed prodigy. Your chances of making it to a top level are quite slim. The same goes with me and pretty much all the people in this forum. You should play chess because you love chess. And maybe one day you can even get a title, but this whole prodigy thing is a long shot.
(sorry the font is like that, I got into some mishaps with the edit button and I had to end up copypasta'ing this thing onto my other paragraph instead of just writing it originally.)

People's chess skill changes as they learn new tactics and strategies. A rating of 1000 might not be a prodigy rating of a 9 years boy, but @hvenki, as you shall see in one of @Yosef115 's games, he plays like a 1400-1500 rated player, which is a prodigy rating.

No! It was a draw. But your engine evaluated that you were winning. My engine said it was a draw. f3 was a blunder. And engine means here your mind!
if im bad
can I say others are bad too uwu
B1ZMARK is EdGy confirmed