VierKazen89 wrote:
Let's test on people, most of them are animals anyway....
Im down with this idea
Animal Testing: For or Against?
Sort:
0
#303
Fkey wrote:
"It is human nature for an inclinition of good, or greater good. We wouldn't want to necessarily hurt anyone or anything on purpose just for the pure satisfaction or sake of it, it's not something to be purely proud of when it concerns animal testing, but it is something that has helped advance science & technology."
Perhaps it would be of benefit to you to get out a little more ?
Because I have a brain and use it to think, right?
Stop complaining fool
fissionfowl wrote:
Fkey wrote:
"It is human nature for an inclinition of good, or greater good. We wouldn't want to necessarily hurt anyone or anything on purpose just for the pure satisfaction or sake of it, it's not something to be purely proud of when it concerns animal testing, but it is something that has helped advance science & technology."
Perhaps it would be of benefit to you to get out a little more ?
Because I have a brain and use it to think, right?
It seems some people are oblivious to the speech marks at opposing ends of the quote, so what does that infer?
Not all people are inherently evil or bad, we use the term good as they bring about positives for themselves, their families or communities at varying levels. Surely you understand what it means when someone says 'inclined'?
lisa_zhang_tok wrote:
I'm for testing on people, but not Animals.
It seems to be thus far the most popular alternative put forward on this thread.
0
#307
kiwi wrote:
fissionfowl wrote:
Fkey wrote:
"It is human nature for an inclinition of good, or greater good. We wouldn't want to necessarily hurt anyone or anything on purpose just for the pure satisfaction or sake of it, it's not something to be purely proud of when it concerns animal testing, but it is something that has helped advance science & technology."
Perhaps it would be of benefit to you to get out a little more ?
Because I have a brain and use it to think, right?
It seems some people are oblivious to the speech marks at opposing ends of the quote, so what does that infer?
Not all people are inherently evil or bad, we use the term good as they bring about positives for themselves, their families or communities at varying levels. Surely you understand what it means when someone says 'inclined'?
Did I disagree with that?
fissionfowl wrote:
kiwi wrote:
fissionfowl wrote:
Fkey wrote:
"It is human nature for an inclinition of good, or greater good. We wouldn't want to necessarily hurt anyone or anything on purpose just for the pure satisfaction or sake of it, it's not something to be purely proud of when it concerns animal testing, but it is something that has helped advance science & technology."
Perhaps it would be of benefit to you to get out a little more ?
Because I have a brain and use it to think, right?
It seems some people are oblivious to the speech marks at opposing ends of the quote, so what does that infer?
Not all people are inherently evil or bad, we use the term good as they bring about positives for themselves, their families or communities at varying levels. Surely you understand what it means when someone says 'inclined'?
Did I disagree with that?
It was in reference to what Fkey had said, post #378
kaynight wrote:
Fkey is in a fowl mood on this animal thread.... Wheeeee!!!!
Your contradictory framework and approach to the forums is understandably irksome. You claim that you will not tolerate nonsensical posts but yet conduct yourself in that manner in the most non-befitting threads.
Sure we all like a little laugh, but there are other forums (including my own) specifically designed for that purpose. This is something requiring of a higher functioning, not a lowly trashcan apprises.
Some people are being led by emotions as you can see.
kaynight wrote:
Well they should lighten up. It's all make- believe here.
Doesn't mean you cannot have mature rational discussions. If you (anyone reading, myself included) want to be one of those 'online freaks' who find satisfaction by moulding their life and personality with the pseudo online reality and explore their uncanny fantasy mind, go ahead. It seems some members are just addicted to the chess.com forums, they have no other purpose in life...
It is what it is, in the sense of what you make it.
It's a serious topic, so it follows the norm of 'serious' behaviour.
He got big spank and slam dunk wham bham thank you ma'am
She gave big spank, serious abuse of animal welfare. Kiiwi kaynight has rights! He is an animal like you !
Live what you preach! And fkey stop using cosmetics
VierKazen89 wrote:
Let's test on people, most of them are animals anyway....
SYK, would you like to volunteer?
No, you volunteer, people like you conduct animal testing
Test to the death good life, towelie is a fake then
Then test on you, maybe u get forgiven for all rubbish you speak..amen
JennbeIoved wrote:
^ this guy, what nonsense are you spouting...
I think it's a riddle...
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Let's test on people, most of them are animals anyway....