I thought @toxic_ness_2 was @a_fellow_gamer?
Attention Everyone: an important announcement.
Sort:
Shush u 2
Nov 1, 2020
0
#4
Itude wrote:
I do not know the exact details, but on looking it appears that none of them were paying members ?
This most certainly means that you are far more liable to get banned, muted or whatever.
That is the reality of a business.
A really naughty person might suggest they open up 2 new accounts in response, and if necessary get a free VPN.
Any further bannings should then be met by again doubling the amount of new accounts.
I of course would never even suggest such a thing !!
You would never suggest those things!
Nov 1, 2020
0
#6
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
23Dragons wrote:
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
You know who banned him. Mods do it causally nowadays. Back then they took the job seriously without bias or influence( I am not saying u r drunk I am talking about a different influence)
Oh I thought they deleted this thread. Anyways I think that the disappearance of @david has to do with this.
C’mon mods fess up
Nov 2, 2020
0
#10
I don’t get it 🤷♂️.........I thought this was an important announcement !
Woollysock wrote:
I don’t get it 🤷♂️.........I thought this was an important announcement !
Quiet socks ur bothering me.
hvenki wrote:
marhales wrote:
23Dragons wrote:
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
You know who banned him. Mods do it causally nowadays. Back then they took the job seriously without bias or influence( I am not saying u r drunk I am talking about a different influence)
ikr, it's rlly just unfair, but if itude is right about the whole membership thing, that shouldnt be the case as well, just because someone is a paying member doesnt mean they should have extra rights, this situation should be treated with equal punishments, I got off easily from a 1 year mute that I managed to change in 1 day, they should too.
If I were to pin one comment, it would be this one.
Nov 2, 2020
0
#13
marhales wrote:
23Dragons wrote:
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
You know who banned him. Mods do it causally nowadays. Back then they took the job seriously without bias or influence( I am not saying u r drunk I am talking about a different influence)
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
23Dragons wrote:
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
You know who banned him. Mods do it causally nowadays. Back then they took the job seriously without bias or influence( I am not saying u r drunk I am talking about a different influence)
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Question: did you need to ban them. There is a mute option.
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
23Dragons wrote:
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
You know who banned him. Mods do it causally nowadays. Back then they took the job seriously without bias or influence( I am not saying u r drunk I am talking about a different influence)
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Also I am saying the DISAPPEARANCE of @david might have to do with the closure of accounts. IMHO these accounts were closed for petty reasons or they or innocent of the mods are hypocritical.
Nov 2, 2020
0
#16
marhales wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
23Dragons wrote:
the dude has been an active forum member for some time . I have never seen him curse, or do anything against the guidelines.
You know who banned him. Mods do it causally nowadays. Back then they took the job seriously without bias or influence( I am not saying u r drunk I am talking about a different influence)
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Also I am saying the DISAPPEARANCE of @david might have to do with the closure of accounts. IMHO these accounts were closed for petty reasons or they or innocent of the mods are hypocritical.
You can think whatever you want, doesn't make any of it true. @david being off site has nothing to do with anything related to the topic at hand.
Nov 2, 2020
0
#17
marhales wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Question: did you need to ban them. There is a mute option.
I could only check three of the accounts, one wasn't a username that resolves. Staff apparently decided a closure was the best option on two, and the other looked like a valid closure as well.
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Question: did you need to ban them. There is a mute option.
I could only check three of the accounts, one wasn't a username that resolves. Staff apparently decided a closure was the best option on two, and the other looked like a valid closure as well.
This is just a cup from the ocean. The situation is much more complex than black and white for @herakIes
MISTER_McCHESS wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Question: did you need to ban them. There is a mute option.
I could only check three of the accounts, one wasn't a username that resolves. Staff apparently decided a closure was the best option on two, and the other looked like a valid closure as well.
when you said "One wasn't a username that resolves", do you mean that @HerakIes got banned because it was an impersonation of @Herakles
No he means that I mispelt one of the names
Nov 2, 2020
0
#20
MISTER_McCHESS wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
marhales wrote:
No, mods do not close accounts casually. Two of the first post accounts were closed by staff. And @david has nothing to do with it.
Question: did you need to ban them. There is a mute option.
I could only check three of the accounts, one wasn't a username that resolves. Staff apparently decided a closure was the best option on two, and the other looked like a valid closure as well.
when you said "One wasn't a username that resolves", do you mean that @HerakIes got banned because it was an impersonation of @Herakles
No, rohaanledzepplin isn't an account.
@herakIes
@toxic_ness_2
@rohaanledzepplin
@chessnoob4151
Edit: @Ripley_Osbourne
these are a few of my friends who got banned for abuse unfairly. Mods bans are used as a last resort. Stop using them casually or don’t ban them for petty reasons. You could have muted them. And if they did something it must be petty. You are protecting you know who even though he brakes a lot of guidelines. Old McMod had a farm e i e i o and a ban ban here and a ban ban there here a ban there a ban everywhere a ban ban. I won’t stop til you reopen all of them. It is time you admit it. And I think the disappearance of @david has to do with this. I want all of u to weigh in but I don’t want this to get locked. Ok. Thank You
Edit: mods what your proof ripley cheated?